Quantcast
Channel: Newsbreak
Viewing all 8614 articles
Browse latest View live

PODCAST: The relationship between the media and Rodrigo Duterte

$
0
0

MANILA, Philippines – President-elect Rodrigo Duterte recently distanced himself from Philippine media by starting his own “boycott” after he got in hot water over controversial statements he made during press conferences.

These statements include his stand on media killings, stating that some of those slain “deserved” their fate as they were corrupt journalists. This prompted Paris-based watchdog group Reporters Without Borders to urge journalists to boycott the Davao city mayor.

The media, however, decided to continue covering him.

People within the circle of Duterte, however, have continuously cautioned against misinterpreting the pronouncements of the president-elect. They urged the press to be “more discerning.”

On June 3, it was announced that he will no longer have press conferences to “minimize mistakes” and instead will course interviews through state-owned PTV. This “boycott,” Duterte said, will last until he steps down as president in 2022. (READ: Duterte: Sorry, no interviews 'until end of my term')

Rappler’s editor-at-large Marites Vitug talks to Vincent Lazatin, one of the conveners of Media Nation, on the relationship between the media and Duterte. Media Nation convenes media executives and journalists to tackle issues the industry faces.

According to him, it’s time for media reports to shift focus to the substance of the president-elect's speeches over his expletives. The press, to better cover Duterte, should treat him as a “troll who says things just to provoke” since falling into his trap will lead the discussion to spiral out of control.  

Lazatin, however, said that Duterte’s statement that there are corrupt members of the press is valid and should be addressed.

Listen in and send us your feedback. – Rappler.com


Cynthia Villar, 15 other senators richer in 2015

$
0
0

MANILA, Philippines – Apart from being the richest senator in 2015, Senator Cynthia Villar also gained the most in terms of wealth that same year.

Based on the latest Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Net Worth (SALN) submitted by senators, Villar's net worth jumped by 76.49%, from P1.98 billion in 2014 to P3.5 billion in 2015.

It was the increase in the value of Villar's personal properties that pulled her net worth up. The major contributor was her investment in shares of stocks, which increased from P713.43 million in 2014 to P2.25 billion in 2015.

The value of her real properties remains at P4.59 million, and she is still liability-free.

Villar is the only billionaire among the senators in the 16th Congress – a status she has maintained since she first declared her SALN as senator in 2013.

Besides her, 15 other senators declared a higher net worth for 2015 – including last year's biggest wealth gainer, reelected Senator Franklin Drilon, whose latest reported wealth increased by 8.06%.

Only 8 senators declared a lower net worth for 2015.

Senator2015 net worth2014 net worth% change
Villar, Cynthia3,500,565,481.001,983,480,135.0076.49
Lapid, Lito43,150,000.0033,800,000.0027.66
Angara, Juan Edgardo118,258,372.00100,357,100.0017.84
Santiago, Miriam85,909,512.0073,033,539.0017.63
Aquino, Bam28,751,800.5924,536,486.5917.18
Drilon, Franklin79,016,838.0073,125,857.998.06
Trillanes, Antonio5,984,089.235,549,000.007.84
Poe, Grace89,118,760.0284,464,819.365.51
Marcos, Ferdinand Jr 
(tax declaration of real property/acquisition cost)
211,077,912.40200,598,008.205.22
Marcos, Ferdinand Jr 
(based on Cuervo Appraisers report)
533,485,237.00509,751,141.704.66
Ejercito, J.V.78,675,444.4875,517,222.664.18
Sotto, Vicente66,800,280.0064,280,460.523.92
Legarda, Loren40,545,259.4239,669,263.002.21
Recto, Ralph531,670,710.90522,006,720.201.85
Cayetano, Allan23,564,540.0023,314,540.001.07
Enrile, Juan Ponce122,118,754.00121,053,463.000.88
Estrada, Jinggoy193,162,258.80192,809,454.100.18
Cayetano, Pia73,322,136.2373,411,196.38-0.12
Pimentel, Koko17,920,025.0018,004,720.00-0.47
Honasan, Gregorio20,944,738.1021,225,615.91-1.32
Binay, Nancy61,360,864.0062,558,816.00-1.92
Escudero, Chiz5,847,082.096,049,082.09-3.34
Revilla, Ramon Jr.173,394,137.80181,870,650.10-4.66
Guingona, Teofisto103,886,695.70113,382,062.30-8.38
Osmeña, Sergio90,525,000.00100,770,000.00-10.17

Net worth since 2013

Villar's 2015 net worth has been the highest among senators since 2013 – the year when the current batch of senators was created. She was part of the batch of senators elected that year.

Apart from her, 11 other senators have maintained an increasing net worth since 2013.

Despite the usual rising trend of annual wealth among officials, at least 4 senators exhibited the opposite pattern. They are Senators Binay, Escudero, Guingona, and Osmeña.

Guingona's net worth dropped after gaining the most in terms of wealth in 2013– earning more than double what he had in 2012.

Escudero has been consistent in being one of the "poorest" senators, yet was questioned for having wed actress Heart Evangelista in a lavish ceremony in the exclusive Balesin Resort in Quezon province.

The net worth of Senators Estrada, Legarda, Poe, and Santiago dropped in 2014, but increased in 2015.

The chart below shows the senators' net worth from 2013 to 2015. They are grouped based on their net worth.

Real properties

Most of the senators declared the same value of real properties from 2013 to 2015.

Only a few indicated increases in their real properties in their latest SALNs:

  • Senators Binay (from P35 million in 2013 to P42 million in 2015), Guingona (from P29.52 million in 2013 to P29.56 million in 2015) and Marcos (from P304 million in 2013 to P376 million in 2015) didn't acquire any new property but adjusted the assessed value of their current real assets
  • Senator Aquino (from P5.82 million in 2013 to P17.4 million in 2015) purchased a residential lot in Silang, Cavite in 2014
  • Senator Lapid (from P37 million in 2013 to P53 million in 2015) purchased a property in Baguio City in an unspecified year

Rappler reported in May 2014 – just days after the release of the 2013 SALNs – that Estrada and Revilla failed to declare new properties they reportedly own. Estrada admitted owning a Wack-Wack property in Mandaluyong, while Revilla opted to keep silent on his reported house in Ayala Alabang.

Both senators – who are now in detention due to their alleged involvement in the pork barrel scam case – didn't declare these discovered properties in their 2014 and 2015 SALNs.

In 2012, the Senate impeached former Supreme Court chief justice Renato Corona for misdeclarations in his SALN. Only Senators Aquino, Binay, Poe, and Villar were not yet part of the Senate then.

Both Revilla and Estrada voted to convict Corona.

Senators Enrile and Pia Cayetano were consistent in being the Senate members with the lowest value of real properties. From 2013 to 2015, Enrile declared just one real property – a land in Nasugbu, Batangas purchased in 1972 for only P1,000 – while Cayetano didn't declare any property. Enrile's Batangas property had an assessed value of P1 million back then and now has a P35 million current fair market value. – with reports from Arleth Myka Cledera/Rappler.com 

Arleth Myka Cledera is a Rappler intern.

Are the Manalo siblings trying to spy on INC?

$
0
0

SNOOPING AROUND? INC spokesperson Edwil Zabala shows photos of alleged spying equipment hidden inside deliveries to Angel and Lottie Manalo at 36 Tandang Sora

The stand-off at the 36 Tandang Sora property in Quezon City continues.

Both the influential Iglesia ni Cristo (INC) and Lottie Manalo-Hemedez, estranged sister of executive minister Eduardo Manalo, are claiming ownership of the two-hectare compound. 

On Saturday, June 18, INC spokesperson Edwil Zabala revealed that the Manila Metropolitan Trial Court had ordered Hemedez, her brother Angel, and their relatives to “immediately leave” the property after the court ruled in favor of the INC over an illegal detainer case filed against the siblings.

This is a separate case from the falsification of public documents case that Hemedez filed against the church, accusing the INC of faking a deed of sale that transferred ownership of 36 Tandang Sora to the church.

As Hemedez and Angel continue to stay inside their residence, they allege harassment from the INC – from cutting their access to water and electricity, building high fences around the area, to pumping sewage water inside the compound. 

The siblings rely on their supporters outside who deliver supplies to 36 Tandang Sora, but not without the tight inspection from INC-deployed security guards. 

During Saturday’s press conference, Zabala said they have a legitimate reason for doing so, saying they discovered electronic devices and wires hidden among the deliveries. 

SPYING EQUIPMENT? Some electronic devices that INC claims they found hidden inside the deliveries for the Manalo siblings. Photo by Mara Cepeda/Rappler

WIRE. The INC also shows a photo of a wire supposedly retrieved from the supplies being sent to the Manalos. Photo by Mara Cepeda/Rappler

“I have here an example of pizza being delivered. And after the pizza was examined, underneath the pizza, you can see certain ingredients which are not usually used in pizza, but which we later learned are parts of something else,” said Zabala, flashing photos before the media.

He said the photos they took, however, were taken sometime between February and March.

NOT JUST PIZZA? The INC flashes photos of a pizza box beling delivered to the Manalos that allegedly contained electronic devices. Photo by Mara Cepeda/Rappler

INC lawyer Moises Tolentino Jr said they find these items, which they claim are either part of a drone or a listening device, to be “very suspicious." 

“We believe we have to be very careful about any objects being brought inside the premises of 36 Tandang Sora which is very close to the central offices of the church,” said Tolentino.

“We are wondering why they will try to smuggle in listening device that from our study, will have a range of some 300 meters. They seem to be intending to snoop around in the compound through these listening devices,” the lawyer added.

Who’s threatening whom? 

Sought for comment, Hemedez’s lawyer Trixie Cruz-Angeles said they are not aware that materials apart from food, water, and basic supplies are being sent to the Manalo siblings.

“Secondly, our clients own the property. They are entitled to deliveries of any kind that should not be subject to the inspection of the guards,” said Angeles. 

She also questioned why the INC only decided to show the photos months after they supposedly took the pictures.

Zabala said guards need to check the deliveres to the Manalos because 36 Tandang Sora is, according to him, part of the INC’s central office. 

“And if you have the chance to visit the central office compound of the Iglesia ni Cristo, you know that visitors are asked to allow their belongings to be checked before we allow them to enter the compound, to bring in anything to the compound. So those same procedures are applied in securing the gate outside of 36 Tandang Sora,” said Zabala. 

But Angeles does not think the Manalos are posing any security threats to the INC, turning the tables on the church.

“Who has armed guards? Who has dogs? Please lang. It’s very clear which people are making threats,” she said. 

‘Show your evidence’ 

Zabala also commented on the Manalo siblings’ claims that the INC is pumping sewage water inside 36 Tandang Sora to force them out. 

‘Yung sinasabi nila ay malayo sa katotohan na kaya nilang patunayan. Sila ang may alegasyon, sila ang dapat magbigay ng pruweba,” said Zabala. 

(What they’re saying is far from the truth that they can possibly prove. They made the allegations so they should provide the evidence.)

Rappler obtained photos taken inside 36 Tandang Sora from the Manalo camp. In the pictures, black water and mud are seen splattered on the stairs and over the floors inside the Manalo house.  

Zabala said the INC is ready to defend itself should the Manalo siblings bring the photos to court.  

Sino ba ang dapat duminig? Kung ‘yung mga photos na ‘yun na nilagay sa social media ay dadalhin nila sa proper forum, handa ang Iglesia na harapin ‘yun,” he said.

(Who should be the judge? If those photos they posted on social media will be brought before the proper forum, the Iglesia is ready to face them.)

Meanwhile, in a report by the Philippine Daily Inquirer, Zabala claimed that the Manalo siblings refused to allow representatives from the Commission on Human Rights to enter the premises.  

“They actively sought the help of the Commission, yet when the CHR appears at their doorstep these expelled church members always give all sorts of excuses not to let the investigators in,” said Zabala. 

“That is the classic conduct of people who are hiding something. They do not want the truth to be known,” he added. – Rappler.com

Now it can be told: What President Aquino loves about China

$
0
0

THANKSGIVING LUNCH. President Benigno S. Aquino III answers questions from members of the Malacanang Press Corpse at his thanksgiving lunch on June 17, 2016, at President Grand Palace Restaurant in Binondo, Manila. Photo by Benhur Arcayan/Malacanang photo Bureau

One thing many people may not know about outgoing President Benigno Aquino III is that he’s a foodie. 

His expertise on – and fondness for – food was apparent at a thanksgiving lunch he hosted for members of the Malacañang Press Corps at his favorite Chinese restaurant on Friday, June 17.  

As soon as he sat down, he acquainted reporters in his table with the President Grand Palace restaurant in Binondo, Manila, his top pick for Chinese food since his college days. He pointed out that the restaurant, a later incarnation of the original, is housed in a former Chinese theater. 

Asked how he discovered it, Aquino said some of his college friends, who included some Filipino-Chinese, would frequent Chinatown to watch the latest Jacky Chan movies not yet screening in regular cinemas – even if they had no English subtitles. Their Chinoy friends would annotate the storyline, real-time.

Eating seemed to be central to his college barkada meet-ups. Aquino said the first question they asked each other was, “Saan tayo kakain (Where will we eat?)”

They would usually cap the day with a midnight snack at the then popular Kowloon House for siopao and dimsum.

Then there was Laloma, famous for its row of roast pig joints. He said there was a time his friends were in a boasting mood and ordered a kilo of lechon– each – plus rice on the side. And this was for dine-in, not for take out.

Chopsticks lesson from Ninoy

The President, an excellent storyteller, had many anecdotes about his dining experiences – and the lack of them when he became Chief Executive – throughout the luncheon.

Holding up his chopsticks, the President recounted how the Aquino family used to go to a Chinese panciteria after hearing Sunday Mass, followed by a movie. His father’s rule? “Ang hindi marunong gumamit ng chopsticks, ‘di puwedeng kumain (You can’t eat if you don’t know how to use chopsticks),” he recalled the late Senator Ninoy Aquino telling them.

They were even forbidden from using the porcelain soup spoon to scoop their food, shortening their learning curve.

When he became president, eating on time became a privilege. Lunch at 3 pm was the norm, and there were many single-meal days. It was worst during the campaign, when Jollibee Yumburgers became his constant companion. Eating good meals at the proper time were small victories in his battle with hyperacidity.

Specialties of the house

SIZZLING OYSTERS. Photo by Mia Gonzalez/Rappler

As the reporters waited for the lauriat to be served, Aquino mentioned two of the restaurants’ specialities: sizzling oysters and the lightly-battered fried squid.

He described the squid as having a light crunch on the outside but succulent and tender when you bite into it. That was exactly what his guests experienced. The sizzling oysters, served on a hot plate, also lived up to the hype and pleased even those who didn’t like eating mollusks. 

LIGHTLY-BATTERED SQUID. Photo by Mia Gonzalez/Rappler

Normally ‘pag masarap ang pagkain, ayaw mo ng fried rice; just plain rice,” the President volunteered. This is because the taste of the food would tend to compete with that of the seasoned fried rice which has other ingredients.

The dishes served were apparently those that the President liked. There were also sauteed shrimps with pepper and chili, sweet and sour pork, abalone with Chinese mushrooms, and steamed crabs with scallions. There were no poultry dishes; the President doesn’t eat chicken or any other fowl dish. (READ: 7 delicious Binondo discoveries)

GOOD FOOD. President Benigno Aquino III (left) samples his favorite dishes at a lunch he hosted for reporters at the President Grand Palace Restaurant on June 17, 2016. With him is Palace Communications Secretary Sonny Coloma. Photo by Mia Gonzalez/Rappler

Aquino is familiar with Chinatown as he worked briefly at the Philippine Business for Social Progress that had an office in Dasmariñas Street, in the early 1980s. He said he also used to frequent nearby Raon to source corporate giveaways for Nike when he worked in its promotions team. – Mia Gonzalez/Rappler.com

Ateneo valedictorian shares love of math through teaching

$
0
0

2016 VALEDICTORIAN. Ateneo's Class of 2016 valedictorian Daniel Joseph Benito is a student leader and member of organizations that taught classes to kids in urban poor communities. Photo by Katerina Francisco/Rappler

MANILA, Philippines – Most people cringe and wince when you talk about mathematics, but not Daniel Joseph Benito. The 20-year-old valedictorian of Ateneo de Manila University’s Class of 2016 grows animated when he talks about one of the most universally-feared subjects in the world.

Benito, who came from Marikina Science High School, leaned towards the sciences when he first mulled his college applications. But it was the joy of problem-solving that led him to take up his course in Applied Mathematics, major in Mathematical Finance in Ateneo.

Feeling ko ma-eenjoy ko ang math. Gusto ko mag-solve kaysa magsulat ng papers related to science. May ibang joy sa pagsasagot ng math, ‘pag nakuha mo sagot sa problem,” he said, before apologizing for being “overly excited” about the subject. (I felt that I would enjoy math. I wanted to solve problems instead of write science papers. There’s a different joy in solving math problems, when you figure out the answer to the problem.)

Daniel isn’t just passionate about math – he’s made it his personal advocacy, one that he lived out in his work teaching children of urban poor communities as member of student organizations Alay ni Ignacio (ANI) and Ateneo EDGE.

Most members of these social development organizations join out of a love for teaching, or an idealistic streak to make a difference in the lives of underprivileged kids.

For Daniel, it was being exposed to ANI’s work that led him to want to be part of it when he entered Ateneo.

When he was a high school senior, he was recruited to join the summer classes and workshops of Pathways to Higher Education, the parent organization of ANI. Watching his ates and kuyas devote their time to teach junior and senior high school students made such a mark on him that it eventually became one of the reasons why he chose to study in Ateneo.

LOVE FOR MATH. Ateneo Class of 2016 valedictorian Daniel Joseph Benito aims to pursue his advocacy of getting children not to fear math. Photo by Katerina Francisco/Rappler

But while Daniel admitted that joining ANI in college was his way of giving back, he stayed because of his belief in the organization’s cause.

“In the beginning it was more of giving back. I saw the experience of my ates and kuyas, and thought that maybe it’s fun to teach and be an ate or kuya to the lower batches. But throughout my stay in the organization, my belief in the advocacy also deepened, that eventually it became more than just giving back. What the organization is fighting for – it becomes part of you,” he said in Filipino.

Personal advocacy

Even before college, Daniel had always warmed to the idea of teaching, so spending countless hours every week teaching the kids of Marikina and Quezon City came easy for him. It also gave him a channel to push for his own personal advocacy: trying to get kids to enjoy math.

“I’m a math major and I love math, so I feel bad when kids are afraid of it. I see them looking at it as an obstacle, and they feel overwhelmed. How much more when they’re confronted with other problems?” he said.

For Daniel, math is more than just crunching numbers and arriving at the right answer. It’s the critical thinking process that’s more important, he said, because it can be applied to other problems that are not necessarily numbers-related.

“The beautiful thing about math is it’s more than just solving the problems. It trains you to think critically, and the necessary skill set needed for problem-solving can be applied in many problems in society. That’s what’s important, the critical thinking and the self-confidence that you can create solutions,” he said.

His students may not always get the right answers, but he considers it a job well done when he gets them to be a little more confident and are encouraged to try harder to solve the problem.

One of his proudest moments was when he received a Christmas card from a Grade 10 student, thanking him for helping her love the subject and overcome her fear of math.

“’Yung goal ko more than anything else, gusto ko magtiwala mga bata sa sarili nila,” he said. (My goal, more than anything else, is to get the kids to believe in themselves.)

{source} <iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/vwfAXLapg9g" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> {/source}

Commitment to the cause

But as much as he loves math – and loves the challenge of sharing his passion with kids – it’s not always easy to get his students to pay attention.

Many times, the kids would ask for piggyback rides instead of sitting down to solve the problems. Daniel said he’s often wondered whether he was being an effective teacher, constantly questioning himself why the children could not seem to grasp his lessons.

Most volunteers would probably pack up and leave, or write the kids off as hopeless causes. It’s a constant problem in these kinds of organizations in Ateneo, which not only face smaller member pools, but an even bigger challenge of keeping them committed and dedicated to the cause.

But what kept Daniel returning week after week was a sense of unfinished business, knowing that it would take more than just a day to help the children realize their potential.

“Hangga’t di ko natuturo mga kailangan kong ituro, ‘yun din ‘yung bagay na nagpapabalik sa akin. May kailangan pa rin akong ituro sa kanila. Hanggang di ko nagagawa ‘yun, babalik at babalik ako. Paulit at paulit akong susubok na mabahagi sa kanila ‘yung kailangan nilang malaman,” he said.

(Until I haven’t taught what I need to teach, that’s exactly the thing that will keep me coming back. I still need to teach them, and until I haven’t achieved that, I’ll keep coming back. I’ll keep trying to impart to them what they need to know.)

One of his friends from high school, Roel Yerro, said Daniel has always tried his best to help others help themselves.

Tinuro niya sa akin ‘yung collective growth. Sobrang naniniwala si Daniel na magaling lang yung isang tao pagka kaya niyang gawing magaling yung ibang tao,” Yerro said.

(He taught me about collective growth. He believes that a person is excellent only if he can make others excel too.)

In his work with kids, Daniel has learned to adjust, trying to balance playtime with study time. And while they may not be able to get through all of the lessons for the day, this doesn’t mean that his visits to the kids’ communities don’t have any impact.

“I feel that we also have a different impact on the kids, like companionship. They have someone to dream with, someone to go on the journey with them,” he said.

{source} <iframe width="100%" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/76z3LLO5q5I" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> {/source}

Keeping the idealistic streak

Four years later, Daniel is leaving Ateneo with several awards under his belt – the most prestigious, of course, being the valedictorian of his batch.

Daniel said he didn’t quite expect it, at one point thinking that he didn’t deserve the honor, especially since he didn’t have such idealistic goals when he first entered Ateneo.

He had pragmatic reasons for entering the university – thinking he could get a good career post-graduation – but he leaves it now with a much deeper sense of fulfillment.

“I was asked how my perception changed in Ateneo. I first thought, after Ateneo, I’d get a good job, help the family. I thought I could only help once I get rich. But here, I realized that you don’t need to be rich first to help. It’s enough that you can share your time and talents with others, to help them realize their own potential,” he said.

As he plans to pursue a master’s degree, Daniel said he is still eyeing more opportunities to continue with his advocacy, and expressed hope that he could continue staving away cynicism as he faces bigger challenges ahead.

But if he does encounter these moments of self-doubt, Daniel said he already has a solution in mind.

“For those moments, I’ll stay silent for a while. One of the things I learned is the importance and value of silence, of stopping, of reflecting, to understand if your values are still intact, if your beliefs and the things you love remain,” he said.

Kungdarating man yung moment na yun, na maging cynical ako, mananahimik na lang muna ako, mag-iisip, magdarasal…Sana sa pananahimik ko na yun, makuha ko yung biyaya at grasya na kailangan ko para magpatuloy,” he said.

(If that moment comes, when I become cynical, I’ll stay quiet for a while, reflect, pray…I hope that in my silence, I’ll be able to find the blessing and grace I need to continue.) – With reports from Rendell Sanchez/Rappler.com

Father’s Day around the globe

$
0
0

MANILA, Philippines – The third Sunday of June has seen a surplus of greetings – both online and in real life – highlighting how we hold our fathers so dear in our hearts.

Father’s Day has become a staple celebration in the Filipino household, filled with intimate meal times or loud karaoke sessions.

But not all countries celebrate this special occasion the way we do. From kingly parades to odd gifts, Father’s Day around the globe shows how varied cultures are, while still recognizing the importance of taking a day for fathers.

Apart from the Filipino way, here's a peek at how Father's Day is celebrated in other parts of the world.

United States

The concept of celebrating a day for fathers may have begun centuries ago, but it was only in 1909 when someone tried to put it on record. Washington resident Sonora Smart Dodd wanted to dedicate a day for her father who raised her and her 5 other siblings after her mother died when she was 16. Although she originally wanted to celebrate it on June 5, her own father’s birthday, the local community assigned it to the third Sunday of June.

The very first Father’s Day on record was on June 19, 1910, the same date we will be celebrating the occasion this year.

A necktie is the most popular gift for Father’s Day in America, and is ranked as the 5th holiday that rakes in the most greeting cards sales, according to cards company Hallmark.

China

The atrocities of World War II prompted China to commemorate a day for its fallen troops and fathers who fought in the war. They chose August 8, as the date translates to baba in Chinese, similar to the term of endearment for the word father.

Now, China has shifted the celebration to the third Sunday of June as well, to conform to international standards. The day is marked by having barbecues and taking fathers out for dinner, just as most people in the rest of the world do.

Russia

Russia does not have an official date for Father’s Day, but the Defender of the Fatherland Day every 23rd of February is its closest equivalent. The date serves as a commemoration of the time when men were recruited in the army to fight in the Russian Civil War in 1919.

A public holiday, most schools and government offices are closed on this day. Local parades are usually organized to honor war veterans, while girls may also give the men in their lives different gifts and tributes.

Brazil

Father’s Day, which Brazilians call Dia dos Pais, is celebrated on the second day of August in this South American country. This is in honor of St Joachim, the Virgin Mary’s father, according to Roman Catholic traditions. While the date deviates from international norms, there isn’t much variation when it comes to festivities.

Brazilians take their fathers out to a restaurant of their choice and enjoy the day with family. Their celebrations, however, tend to be much bigger since 3 generations – grandfather, father, and grandson – normally make up each family.

Thailand

The celebration of Father’s Day in Thailand is tied to the reigning monarch’s birthday. In the current case, King Bhumibol Adulyadej was born on December 5, stamping the date for future commemorations of dads in the country. Thais look at the king as the number one role model for fathers, and festivities are marked with shouts of “Long live the King!”

A candle-lighting ceremony is held throughout the country to wish the king long life. The portrait of the king and the national flag are hung across the streets.

The same rule applies to the celebration of Mother’s Day, when the queen’s birthday is adopted.

Australia

Australians honor their fathers on the first Sunday of September, which also happens to be the first Sunday of spring. Aside from a deviation in date, Aussies celebrate Father’s Day much like other countries do – with dinner celebrations with fathers or family reunions.

Since the celebration falls on a Sunday, it also gives fathers the chance to just relax and unwind from a long week, making the celebration more stress-free.

Germany

The day wouldn’t be complete if alcohol wasn’t involved – this is what Germans think of when they think about Father’s Day. Called Vatertag, the German term for Father’s Day, or simply Mannertag to include all men in Men’s Day, celebrations are set 40 days after Easter. This is the day when Jesus Christ is believed to have ascended into heaven, which usually falls on May.

They also have a tradition where men pull wagons called the bollerwagen, supposedly to assert their manhood. The event is so notorious for its beer-drinking events that many have sought to put a ban on liquor-drinking during Vatertag. Efforts have been futile, however, and alcohol continues to overflow on the date for men.

Spain

Called El Día del Padre, Spain’s celebration of Father’s Day is influenced by Catholic tradition. The date is set on March 19, the feast day of Saint Joseph, Mary’s husband. Saint Josephis seen as the prime example of a good husband and dedicated father.

Their Father’s Day coincides with the celebration of Las Fallas in the Spanish city of Valencia. Here, residents burn huge monuments made primarily of wood that symbolize events in the previous year. Although mostly of pagan origin, residents eventually linked Las Fallas to Saint Joseph’s day, since he was a carpenter.

South Korea

In the grander scheme of things, South Korea has reserved the month of May for families. While the 5th of May is dubbed Children’s Day, they have combined Mother’s Day and Father’s Day into a single date, May 8. The date was only supposed to honor Mother’s Day until 1973, when the question of having an occasion for fathers surfaced. Instead of establishing another holiday, the South Korean government just converted Mother’s Day into Parent’s Day.

Gifts given to parents on this day would probably seem odd to the rest of the world, but have become a norm in South Korean pop culture.

Instead of the usual clothes or sporting gear, Koreans opt to give their parents cosmetic surgey – face lifts, botox treatments, and even hair transplants – a gesture intended to make their parents look younger. – Rappler.com

CHR: Protecting human rights involves the leadership

$
0
0

STARTS WITH LEADERSHIP. Commission on Human Rights (CHR) Chairperson Chito Gascon says that protecting human rights ultimately involves the leadership of a country. Photo by Jodesz Gavilan/Rappler

MANILA, Philippines – Commission on Human Rights (CHR) Chairperson Chito Gascon said that the leadership should ultimately be involved in protecting human rights for all to fully uphold human rights in the Philippines.

“If the leadership speaks the language of human rights, then it will cascade to the personnel and ultimately we will see more respect for human rights,” he told Rappler on Wednesday, June 15. “But if the leadership disregards it, then we might of course see an undermining of these efforts.” 

However, the president-elect has been constantly called out by various groups – including the CHR – for his statements and actions that undermine the rights of different sectors. This includes his firm view on killing criminals. (READ: Duterte: No 'bloodless cleansing' vs crime)

This has led to a number of his supporters calling for the abolition of CHR because it protects criminals.

But according to Gascon, contrary to this common misconception, the CHR upholds the “nature of human rights” which includes everyone.

“Because we are human, we are imbued with certain entitlements which we call rights and these should be protected in a free and democratic society,” he explained. “And when human rights are undermined, we undermine freedom and democracy as well.”

‘Approach as they unfold’

Although there is a floating narrative of the need for “less rights and strong man rule” or authoritarianism, Gascon said that it is unacceptable to correct injustice by “perpetuating more injustice.”

“We understand why people are asking for justice,” he said. “What has to happen is to address the problem of injustice by delivering more justice, by ensuring the rule of law, by protecting human rights.”

The challenge now lies in raising awareness about the importance of upholding the law and protecting human rights at the same time, especially under the incoming administration.

“We view this as a challenge in the sense that we need to continue to inform the public and the government, law enforcement agencies, as well as prosecutors about the importance of human rights,” Gascon said. “Hopefully, in the course of this conversation, we will come to better understanding as a community.”

With regard to the new administration, the CHR will continue to fulfill its mandate of protecting the Bill of Rights enshrined in the 1987 Constitution by being a watchdog that will constantly remind the government of its responsibilities to these rights.

“We are concerned about statements made that may undermine civil and political rights,” Gascon said. Rather than be "speculative", they will, however, “approach things as they unfold” 

“We will deal with facts and events as they materialize and speak to that,” he added.

The reimposition of the death penalty, for example, will be a complete violation of the 1987 Constitution and international treaties to which the Philippines is a signatory, according to Gascon. (READ: Duterte vows to reintroduce death penalty)

The country was the first Asian country to abolish the death penalty under the 1987 Constitution, only for it to be reimposed in 1993 during the administration of Fidel V. Ramos by virtue of Republic Act 7659.

It was, however, abolished again under the Arroyo administration through Republic Act 9346 in 2006. The Philippines signed the Second Optional Protocol to the ICCPR not long after.

Reimposing the death penalty, Gascon said, will be a direct violation of the treaty we voluntarily signed, and this may result in consequences.

CHR, however, is anticipating a “rigorous debate” since it will go through Congress.

“Actually right now the debates are beginning but thankfully it will go through Congress,” Gascon said. “It will be a full hearing and we anticipate that there will be a rigorous debate and ultimately we will come to a consensus about what’s best for the country.”

Involving the leadership

Despite the pronouncement made by the president-elect accusing the commission of “nitpicking” after he was found to have violated the Magna Carta of Women following his statement regarding an Australian woman who was raped and murdered in 1989, the CHR is still looking forward to working with the incoming administration on how to better uphold human rights in the country.

However, as an independent constitutional body, the commission is ready to stand by its mandate.

“If we see human rights being protected and defended, we will cheer,” Gascon emphasized. “If we see human rights being violated, we will call this out.”

“And we will hope that all government officials whether at the national, local level will understand that this is the mandate that we’ve been given to perform,” he added. – Rappler.com

What's a Marcos painting doing in Robredo's future office?

$
0
0

FERDINAND MARCOS. The late dictator is depicted here as a soldier. Photo by Bea Cupin/Rappler

It’s a painting that doesn’t immediately grab your attention despite its size, but once you take a closer look, the man right smack in the middle is sure to catch your eye.

One of the bigger paintings that decorate the Quezon City local government’s “Executive House” – the future home of the Office of the Vice President– is one made by Jose Blanco, commissioned by the late dictator Ferdinand Marcos.

The piece depicts… who else, but Marcos as a hero.

It’s ironic considering who the next occupant of the sprawling home will be: Vice President-elect Leni Robredo, who recently beat Senator Ferdinand Marcos Jr, namesake and only son of the late dictator.

“That is a painting by Jose Blanco, commissioned by former President Marcos... kaya mukha niya 'yung ando'n eh (That's why he's depicted there). We got that not for any political reasons,” explained Quezon City Mayor Herbert Bautista.

Bautista oversaw the rebuilding and refurbishing of the house, which formerly – and infamously – known as the “Boracay Mansion.”

Bautista, by the way, happens to have been an official of the now-defunct Kabataang Barangay, which was headed by Marcos' oldest daughter Imee. KB is the precursor of the Sangguniang Kabataan.

ART BY HEART. Celebrity Heart Evangelista's is among the many art pieces inside the house. Photo by Bea Cupin/Rappler

The Blanco piece is only one of the many paintings that adorn the “Executive House.” At the main sitting area is a newer art piece by local celebrity Heart Evangelista, wife of defeated vice president candidate Francis Escudero.

Bautista joked that they should also buy a piece depicting the “Magdalo” flag, a reference to a defeated vice president candidate whose political party carries the same name.

But the Blanco piece – and even the Evangelista piece – won’t be inside the Executive House for long.

All the art pieces belong to the Quezon City government and will likely be removed in time for Robredo’s stay in the New Manila house. – Bea Cupin/Rappler.com


'Failed leadership' in Comelec: A memo waiting to happen

$
0
0

ELECTIONS CHIEF. Commission on Elections (Comelec) Chairman Andres Bautista, a former law dean appointed by President Benigno Aquino III to the poll body, is set to lead the Comelec until February 2, 2022. File photo by Jay Abad

MANILA, Philippines – Exactly 10 days before the May 9 polls, reporters covering the Commission on Elections (Comelec) noticed a big grayish poster on a wall of the Comelec headquarters.

Easily seen in front of the 8th floor elevator, the poster had letter cut-outs that read: "We love and support you…Chairman Andy." It was from Comelec Chairman Andres "Andy" Bautista's "Comelec family."

The poster was signed by dozens of Comelec employees. "Chair, we are at your side. Go, go go!" "You have our 100% support!!!" "We support you all the way."

Sources said the poster was meant to cheer up Bautista, who just came from a huge defeat – in his own backyard.

This poster, which spoke of being on Bautista’s "side," was one of the earlier signs of discord in the poll body. 

It's part of an internal conflict that became evident on Thursday, June 23, after a memo showed all 6 Comelec commissioners criticizing Bautista for his supposedly "failed leadership."

When that poster appeared on April 29, Bautista had just lost his bid to turn a number of malls into polling precincts. The Comelec voted 4-3 against his mall voting proposal.

It was the pet project of Bautista, a former law dean who used to run Shangri-La malls and hotels in the Philippines. 

Chairman Bautista's appeal 

Bautista's frustration was that of the 4 who voted against it, 3 used to favor mall voting. 

They did so after former Comelec commissioner Gregorio Larrazabal warned that the mall voting project had become illegal. Larrazabal said the law prohibits the transfer of polling precincts less than 45 days before elections – and it was already less than two weeks before the May 9 polls.

This issue prompted Bautista, a law professor known for carefully choosing his words, to openly criticize his colleagues for their decisions.

His fellow Comelec members should maintain "stability in decision-making," Bautista said on April 27. He said, "Dapat iniisip mo kung ano talaga ang iyong boto, kung ano ‘yung iyong paninindigan." (You should really think hard about your vote, and what you would stand for.)

(Watch his statement in the video below)

That same day, in a move that surprised journalists, he also released the transcript of their meetings to prove that his colleagues previously agreed to mall voting. "Kayo na ang maghusga," he said in a news conference. (You be the judge.)

He never forgot this issue until election day.

Doing his rounds on May 9, Bautista apologized to voters whose precincts had been slated to be transferred to malls. Shaking his head, he looked at a group of voters in Quezon City and said, "Bumaliktad ‘yung iba naming commissioner. Hayaan 'nyo, sa susunod." (Our other commissioners changed their minds. Don’t worry, there’s a next time.)

(Watch that scene in the video below)

Bib vests and more 

Certainly, Bautista and other Comelec members faced other contentious issues as they approached the May 9 elections.

Bautista, for one, wanted the Comelec to buy bib vest uniforms worth P26.55 million ($574,300) for teachers serving as election inspectors. After initially agreeing to this, majority of Comelec members voted to scrap this project. 

Bautista also proposed to hold the canvassing of votes at the Manila Hotel instead of the government owned Philippine International Convention Center (PICC). The Comelec ended up junking Bautista’s proposal and canvassing votes in PICC.  

There was also the issue of replacement ballots, another proposal by Bautista. The poll chief wanted to issue replacement ballots to voters whose ballots get rejected through no fault of their own.  

Most Comelec members agreed with Bautista, but it is worth noting who rejected this bid. One of them was Comelec Commissioner Christian Lim, the man who practically ran the May 9 elections as its steering committee head. 

In other issues, who can forget the widely publicized rift between Bautista and Comelec Commissioner Rowena Guanzon?

In January, Bautista issued Guanzon a memo for filing an "unauthorized" comment on the case of then presidential bet Senator Grace Poe before the Supreme Court.

Guanzon responded by attacking Bautista for allegedly "showing partisanship" in addressing cases filed by Poe.

'Culmination of petty quarrels'

Quarrels like this in the Comelec had surfaced as early as last year, according to a Comelec observer who has had close and frequent dealings with the poll body.

Referring to the recent memo on Bautista's supposedly "failed leadership," the source said, "Parang culmination na lang ‘yan ng mga ano nila, petty quarrels, which started last year." (That was just like a culmination of their petty quarrels, which started last year.)

That statement on "failed leadership," in many ways, was a Comelec memo waiting to happen.

In their actual memo dated June 3, all 6 Comelec commissioners hit Bautista for his supposed failures as elections chief. These include his alleged inaction on the delayed allowances of teachers who served as election inspectors.

For Comelec insiders, the problem boils down to the ability of Bautista, a former big boss in the corporate world, to run a collegial body where he has only one vote. 

This ability requires not only the brains of a Bar topnotcher and Harvard graduate (which Bautista is), but also a good relationship with fellow workers. While a Comelec chairman has only one vote like the 6 other commissioners, leadership in a collegial body is seen in the ability to set the agenda and influence peers.

Bautista’s predecessor, veteran election lawyer Sixto Brillantes Jr, was known to be savvy in persuading his colleagues and galvanizing support.

A source who once worked with Brillantes, in fact, said the former chair would rather drop a proposal of his, than get a vote that is less than unanimous.

While attacking outsider-critics, Brillantes was also seen to be consultative when it comes to colleagues.

'Unauthorized' trip to Japan?

In the case of Bautista, one complaint is that he sometimes doesn’t consult his colleagues for things that need their approval. One of his co-workers said that in their meetings, the chairman gets annoyed whenever he doesn't get his way.

Just recently, an issue raised against him was his personal trip to Japan from June 23 to 26.

Bautista has been questioned by his colleagues for taking this leave of absence without the approval of the Comelec en banc, or the commission sitting as a whole. 

The Comelec chairman said the law allows him, as head of his agency, to sign his own travel authority. He said the chairperson of the Commission on Audit and the Ombudsman also "sign their travel authorities as heads of their respective agencies."

At the same time, Bautista is also perceived as slow in acting on key projects.

For instance, Parish Pastoral Council for Responsible Voting chairperson Henrietta de Villa said the Comelec lost focus on the mall voting proposal, which found itself back on the radar only when it was too late.

But the biggest accusation against Bautista, so far, involves his supposedly "failed leadership" as stated in the 6 commissioners' memo on June 3.

In an interview with GMA News on Friday, June 24, he refuted this statement about "failed leadership." How can that be, Bautista said, when the May 9 polls have been viewed as one of the most successful elections in Philippine history?

The US think tank Carter Center, for one, cited reports that the May 9 polls "marked a significant improvement over previous Philippine elections." The National Citizens’ Movement for Free Elections, a poll watchdog, lauded the Comelec this year as well.

Under Bautista, the Comelec managed to run this year's elections even as it faced one crisis after another. These issues include the Supreme Court (SC) decision stopping the repair of vote-counting machines – which he addressed immediately after assuming office in May 2015 – to another SC decision in March 2016 compelling the Comelec to issue voting receipts. 

In his interview with GMA News, Bautista also denied that he refuses to meet with the 6 Comelec commissioners to discuss their concerns in their headquarters.

"Baliktad nga e. Ako nga ang parating nandoon at ang ilan ang hindi pumapasok," he said on Friday. (It’s the other way around. I’m the one who’s always there, while some don’t report for work.) 

In fact, Bautista often stresses that he employs a consultative method in running the Comelec. His consultations, too, often go beyond the poll body – as when he listens to critics like former Comelec commissioner Augusto Lagman, whom the short tempered Brillantes often scoffed at.

Morale of Comelec employees

In any case, for recent issues hounding Bautista, stakeholders agree that dialogue is crucial.

Bautista said he has spoken with a number of commissioners and will continue speaking with the rest next week, after his personal trip to Japan.

Comelec commissioners also want to meet with Bautista soon to settle their issues.

Another source in the Comelec, who refused to be named, meanwhile cautioned the public against thinking that the 6 commissioners "are solid" against Bautista. "They are not," he said.

He pointed out that 4 of 6 commissioners signed the June 3 memo "with a heavy heart," saying they want to validate certain facts and observe "due process and material courtesy." 

The head of an election watchdog, for her part, hopes that recent issues in the Comelec will "be resolved internally."

Rona Caritos, executive director of the poll watchdog Lente, said the statement about "failed leadership" can affect the Comelec as an institution. 

"May effect ‘yan sa morale ng mga tao sa loob ng Comelec, especially coming from a hard election na sobrang stretched and stressed 'yung mga tao," Caritos told Rappler on Friday. 

(That has an effect on the moral of people inside Comelec, especially coming from a hard election that stressed out and stretched people.)

She added, "Ang hirap magtrabaho for a leader na ang tingin ng mga fellow commissioners in the en banc, is a failed one."

(It’s hard to work for a leader who, in the view of fellow commissioners in the en banc, is a failed one.)

For now, the situation is "wait and see" for many Comelec employees. After all, it's the first time in years – or the first time ever – for all Comelec commissioners to criticize their chairman in a memo bared in public. – Rappler.com

The emotional journey of Benigno Aquino III

$
0
0

LEGACY. 'There is no place in the country that I am afraid to go to because we neglected them,' says President Benigno Aquino III. Photo by Robert Vinas/Malacañang Photo Bureau

MANILA, Philippines – President Benigno Aquino III still has time left on his tenancy, but he’s already packed.

The 15th Philippine president didn’t seem to have as much baggage as most of his predecessors when he walked into Malacañang in 2010. He’s an orphan and a bachelor. He had a girlfriend at the time, but not for long, and many friends – quite a few with him on the full stretch of the Daang Matuwid journey to his promised Philippines, where a crackdown on corruption would free people from poverty. 

But as Aquino prepares to leave his temporary bachelor’s pad, he may find his take-home load far heavier than what he had brought with him, capping an odyssey where public emotions – and the question of whether the Chief Executive considered them – were key.

The son of democracy icons Ninoy and Cory Aquino was propelled to power by a nuclear explosion of emotions – national grief over his mother’s death, and the same depth and breadth of public anger toward the sins of his predecessor. The fallout was not felt until the last full year of his term, when the same adoring public found itself inconsolable and outraged by a few of the “uncaring” decisions he and his administration had made. 

His story

On a Tuesday afternoon at Malacañang's Music Room, Aquino gives Rappler a broader look at where his leadership has taken the Philippines. (WATCH: Rappler interviews Aquino)

ANIMATED STORYTELLER. President Benigno Aquino III stresses a point during Rappler Talk with Maria Ressa at the Palace Music Room on June 7, 2016. Photo by LeAnne Jazul/Rappler

“There is no place in the country that I am afraid to go to because we neglected them,” he says, before diving into how his flagship conditional cash transfer program has begun to break intergenerational poverty.

Aquino talks with Rappler for nearly 3 hours in two rounds of interviews. He takes only one break. Throughout, he remains relaxed, confident, and in good spirits, regardless of the questions asked – the picture of a retiring public servant satisfied with a job well done. 

Aquino is slightly leaning to his right, arms folded, sometimes one hand scooping his cheek – a mannerism he shares with his successor. His periodic fits of coughing– the subject of news stories early in his term – are no longer jarring; he has somehow integrated these into his speech and doesn’t keep him from responding to questions. 

More than a few times, he moves his hands to animate his anecdotes, his adventures and misadventures as president, and to punctuate his achievements. He uses his voice the same way. He has always been a lively storyteller, far from the emotionless Chief Executive some perceive him to be.

A sensitive man

People who have worked with Aquino describe him as considerate and maawain (compassionate). This can be seen in small, everyday gestures behind Palace doors.

"Ladies first," is a given at the start of shared meals. A Palace official says he would always remind the female staff members to heed the President’s call because if they follow protocol and wait for Aquino to get food first, all of them would starve. 

Midway through his term, Aquino visited the wake of a Malacañang Press Corps member who died of cancer. After noticing that the father was sickly, he directed an aide to schedule him for a check-up. Knowing that the late journalist was the breadwinner, he asked whether her two siblings had jobs. The Office of the President hired the older one.

At events with children, Aquino turns into everybody's favorite uncle, high-fiving tiny hands left and right, asking questions, cracking jokes. 

UNCLE PNOY. President Benigno Aquino III high-fives with children dressed as elves during the DSWD's Pasko ng Batang Pinoy Project at the Palace grounds on December 19, 2012. Photo by Gil Nartea/Malacañang Photo Bureau

In discussions with public officials, his oft-repeated order is to deliver "palpable" and enduring reforms that would benefit future generations. There's the Aluling bridge, for example, that connects Ilocos Sur to Mountain Province completed only under his watch – after over 30 years and 6 presidents. Before it was finally opened to traffic in 2013, it was jokingly called the "longest bridge" because of the time it took to be completed. 

Aquino, a known history buff, is conscious of how future Filipinos would look back at his presidency. During the election season, when his anointed candidates sorely needed a boost, he vetoed the proposed Social Security System (SSS) pension hike bill and refused to support the income tax cut for low-salary earners – low-hanging fruits; gifts, even, for an administration reviled as uncaring. (READ: Aquino: 82 bills rejected in 6 years)

Explaining his decisions then, Aquino said he would rather be called "heartless" now than "heartless and careless" in the future, when the SSS goes bankrupt and its members are left holding the bag if he had signed the bill into law. The bill seeking to scrap income tax payment for fixed-income earners would deny government a steady revenue stream for its social services and key programs. Congress did not give him any proposal to compensate for the loss. 

Aquino may have learned from former president Fidel Ramos. He is credited with reinvigorating the Philippine economy by solving the power crisis and breaking up monopolies in industries such as in telecommunications, which mobile phone-dependent Filipinos enjoy to this day. But today, Ramos is arguably most remembered for the country's prevailing expensive power costs – the highest in the region and a dampener on investments – because of the Ramos administration's flawed negotiated contracts with power suppliers.

Aquino's argument is lost on critics who cannot shake off their image of the callous Chief Executive who chose a scheduled car plant function than comfort widows of elite cops who got butchered in the southern Philippines.

For them, he’s the unsympathetic leader who inspired a thousand and one memes and crisp expletives from people stuck in queues at train stations or in Metro Manila traffic. Worst of all, some of them say, he has developed a thick skin to broadsides against his leadership.

Aquino is not as onion-skinned as he was during his early years, when his new administration was ridiculed as a "Student Council" government. This is clear in how he answered some of Rappler's questions that might have visibly piqued him years ago. But he continues to be sensitive to criticism, which the public would sometimes glimpse at press conferences or in some of his public addresses.

This is a common observation of those who have worked with him and journalists who have covered him: In a sea of praise, he would likely remember the lone buoy of disapproval – or what looks to him like censure – bobbing in the surf. Its mildest form is his continued insistence that he never had a honeymoon with the public, the media, since he assumed office, though his survey numbers prior to the Mamasapano incident would debunk this claim. 

The heartbreaks

Though already a senator, Aquino was a minor political figure when he came under the spotlight in 2008, the year his mother began a year-and-a-half long bout with colon cancer. The family spokesman, he was tasked with updating the public about the condition of former president Corazon Aquino, and ultimately, her passing, even when he had not yet dealt with his own grief.

Facing local and international media hours after Mrs Aquino’s death, he kept his composure and managed to "smile" as he spoke – a default facial expression that he would get criticized for when he became president – but his voice betrayed him when he relayed how the family was holding up. 

Years later, he would recall these personal losses to explain why he chose not to lead the arrival honors for the slain Special Action Forces (SAF) cops in Camp Bagong Diwa. When his father, former Senator Benigno “Ninoy” Aquino Jr was assassinated upon his return to Manila nearly in 1983, and when his mother died 26 years later, his family needed time to grieve. This was what he wanted to give the SAF 44 families, he would say everytime the issue is raised.

In a Rappler roundtable interview, Aquino counts the Mamasapano clash as among the biggest heartbreaks of his presidency, along with the Supreme Court ruling on the Disbursement Acceleration Program (DAP), and Super Typhoon Yolanda (Haiyan).

The Mamasapano incident, he says, “gained traction” so all his political foes rode on the issue. 2015, after all, was the year before the presidential elections. Up to that point, there was no major issue that could dent his popularity.

“Mamasapano was anything and everything that I did or didn’t do,” he says. “Bakit 'di ko sinalubong ang SAF 44 (Why didn’t I welcome the SAF44)?”

There were repeated suggestions for him to stand beside the widows and their families as the mangled bodies of their loved ones arrived at the tarmac, but he wanted to give the families space, and for all government assistance ready by his pre-scheduled meeting with them the following day.

The next day, he attended the necrological services and met with the families. Some grief-stricken family members did not even want to look at him, but some were overheard asking the President to help get their children into the Philippine Military Academy. To this day, he believes he had done the right thing. 

GRIEF. President Benigno Aquino III (center) pays his respects before one of 44 police commandos killed in a botched anti-terror operation, during a necrological service at Camp Bagong Diwa on January 30, 2015. Photo by Noel Celis/AFP

“To my mind, the best way to do that was to have as much as possible a non-emotional period with them,” he says.

Siyempre, kung ano-ano na ang sinabi….Pero ‘yun nga ang point. Sa totoo lang, di ko naman puwedeng sabihing manhid ako pero as much as possible, kung ako naman binabanatan ng nonsense, bahala na kayo. I have X amount of time to be able to effect all the changes that we want. I cannot spend all this time wasting it on something that does not lead to a betterment of the situation of our people,” Aquino adds.

(Of course, so many things were said….But that’s the point. Honestly, I can’t say that I’m unsympathetic but as much as possible, if the attacks against me are nonsense, it’s up to you. I have X amount of time to be able to effect all the changes that we want. I cannot spend all this time wasting it on something that does not lead to a betterment of the situation of our people.)

It snowballed into a "series of unfortunate incidents," as one political observer calls it. Some candidates used the “manhid (uncaring) image of Aquino in managing the Mamasapano crisis and sewed it into other urban woes, creating a potent quilt of miseries under his Daang Matuwid leadership.

Show of sympathy

Aquino usually shuns public stunts that he believes are meant only to earn empty brownie points. He did not go to the wake of Filipino transgender woman Jennifer Laude, who was killed by US Marine Joseph Scott Pemberton in Olongapo City in 2014, because he said he didn't know her and personally condoling with her family would just be uncomfortable for both sides.

“It’s like how can I say that I really sympathize with their loss and have some relevant discussion with them on trying to assuage their loss at that point in time?” Aquino said in a news briefing then, when asked if he would go to Laude's wake. Readers commenting on the Rappler story page were generally in agreement with the President, saying it was better for him not to be "opportunistic."

When Aquino chooses to go to public events, it's usually for major crises. This was evident in the last quarter of 2013, when the country was rocked by natural and man-made disasters. 

YOLANDA SURVIVOR. President Benigno Aquino III checks on a Yolanda survivor in a mobile hospital on November 18, 2013. Photo by Gil Nartea/Malacañang Photo Bureau

For 11 days in September, 2013, the President stayed in Zamboanga City  to personally oversee operations to end the Zamboanga siege. He wanted to make sure that there would be no civilian casualties. In the end, over 200 people were killed during the crisis, mostly Moro National Liberation Front members belonging to the faction of Nur Misuari. There were several civilian deaths. 

A day after a 7.2-magnitude earthquake struck Central Visayas on October 15, 2013, Aquino flew to Bohol and Cebu. A week later, he and members of his Cabinet returned to Bohol and slept in pitched army tents in hardest-hit Loon. This was to show “solidarity” with the victims and to signal a return to normalcy after the tragedy. 

"Dinesisyon po namin na ipakita sa inyo kung paano paniniwala [na ligtas na dito], ‘di siyempre wala pong mas magandang pruweba ‘yan kung hindi ‘yung makiisa kami sa inyo ngayon, dumamay ngayong gabi (We decided that there is no better way to prove that it is safe here than to be with you, in solidarity, tonight),” he told the people there. 

In November 2013, Super Typhoon Yolanda (Haiyan) struck Eastern Visayas. Before Yolanda made landfall, he addressed the nation to remind affected local governments and communities to do preemptive evacuation. “This is a very real danger,” he said then. 

If he wanted to milk the disaster to his advantage, Aquino says he would have ordered the live TV broadcast of the government briefing on Yolanda. Then, he says, he would have made an overly dramatic, impassioned appeal “showing all my emotions.”

Grabe na ho itong bagyong ito (This typhoon is really serious),” he says in an exaggerated pleading voice, giving a glimpse of the option he rejected. Doing this, he says, would have triggered pandemonium. Instead, he chose to calmly apprise the public on the gravity of the impending situation.

Parating ine-emphasize, act presidential. Pero ito, more than anything, ang idea ko: ‘Kaya kitang ikalma. Obligasyon ko. Kaya kitang maka-recover nang mas maaga. Obligasyon ko.’ Ngayon kung ako may frustration, may galit, may tampo, whatever, bahala na ang tiyan ko. Kaya dito na ako nakatikim ng hyperacidity,” says the 56-year-old Aquino.

(Always emphasize, act presidential. But this, more than anything, my idea was: ‘I can calm you down. That’s my obligation. I can help you recover earlier. That’s my obligation. Now, if there is frustration, anger, hard feelings, whatever, my stomach will deal with that. That’s why I only experienced hyperacidity here.)

IN THE THICK OF THINGS. President Benigno Aquino III in Palo, Leyte, after Yolanda struck Eastern Visayas. Photo from Malacañang Photo Bureau

Yolanda killed over 6,000 people. He went to the ravaged communities afterwards to bring relief goods and a message of hope. He came across people who remained resilient even after they had lost everything but their lives.

While discussing Yolanda, Aquino tells Rappler an anecdote about Guiaun Mayor Christopher Sheen Gonzales, when national government officials visited his Eastern Samar town after Yolanda. 

Aquino said that when the mayor, who sustained an arm injury while helping evacuate residents to safer ground, was alone with the national officials inside a vehicle, he finally had time to lower his guard.

He said Gonzales told the officials: “'Salamat, dumating kayo. Sa totoo lang, lahat sumasandal sa akin – ‘yung tirahan, tarpaulin, yung pantakip ng bubong, pagkain, gamot. Sa totoo lang, siyempre, matibay ako! Ngayon nandito na kayo, mas marami kayong kaya, puwede ba ihinga ko na sa inyo lahat ito? Ibubuhos ko naman, sa inyo naman ako sasandal.'Pagbaba ng kotse, sabi ni Mayor,‘Okay na ako.’” 

(Thanks, you're here. Honestly, everyone is leaning on me for shelter, roofing, food, medicine. In truth, of course, I'm strong! Now that you're here, you can do a lot more so can I just vent this all out to you? Let me lean on you." When he alighted from the car, the mayor said, "I'm okay now.")

“If he collapses, everybody else [will too],” Aquino says.

The value of empathy

Asked whether there is value in empathy in a president, Aquino nods after he takes a sip of water. Then he asks matter-of-factly: “I’ve been accused of lacking empathy. Can you help me? Can you give me an example when I lacked empathy? Can you give me a situation where I was supposed to have lacked empathy?”

He recounts the 1987 coup attempt against the first Aquino administration, when he was nearly killed by rebel soldiers while he was on his way to Malacañang. This happened because he wanted to be with his family during the turmoil and he did not check with security officials before heading to the Palace.

Aquino lost 3 of the 4 people who were with him. He got shot 5 times, one leaving an irremovable bullet in the left side of his neck. Aquino says the experience has taught him not to be impulsive. 

If somebody is undergoing a tragedy and ang ginawa ko nakiiyak lang ako sa kanya – ‘Paano na kami nito?’ ‘Paano ka nga ba?’ [feigns crying] – ang paniwala ko, papaano makakatulong? Parang ang papel ko, ama ng bayan, masasandalan niya," Aquino says.

 (If somebody is undergoing a tragedy and what I did was, I cried along with him – ‘What will happen to us?’ ‘What will happen to you?’ [feigns crying] – my belief is, how will it help? My role is to be the father of the nation, someone one can lean on.)

He adds: “I have to show I am in control. I have to show, ‘Yes we will be able to help you. We are now actually helping you. Or we have directed the relevant agencies and organizations to render you whatever assistance you need.’”

Apparently learning from the lessons of the Mamasapano incident, Aquino went to the wake of two soldiers killed in an encounter with the Bangsamoro Islamic Freedom Fighters in May 2015. Thirteen months later, he personally condoled with families of slain soldiers, and checked on those wounded in an encounter with the Abu Sayyaf in Basilan.

Anger manager

Another emotion that Aquino has learned to control is his anger, especially when it involves decision-making. He says this is something he learned to do early in his life.

During a sikaran match – a Filipino martial art likened to streetfighting which involves the using one’s hands and feet – the teenage Aquino’s anger got the better of him and he became careless.

First tournament, napuruhan niya ako. Ang habol ko makabawi lang; walang focus. Sabi ng instructor ko, ‘‘Pag galit ka, walang focus," the President says. (First tournament, my opponent got me good. My only aim was to hit back; I lost focus. My instructor later told me, "If you’re angry, you lose focus.")

At meetings, Aquino has been observed not to show his frustration with flawed presentations and arguments through the usual means. Unlike some of his predecessors, he doesn’t yell or throw things on the table. If he gets too angry, he would take a break. He has also been seen quietly gripping the table to keep himself from losing his cool. He doesn't want anger to cloud his judgment.

THOROUGH. Presenting at Cabinet meetings is likened to a thesis defense in front of President Benigno Aquino III. Photo from Malacañang Photo Bureau

“Any decision made in anger is normally wrong. Kung galit ako, pause muna (If I get angry, we have to pause first),” he says.

The President says he’s also conscious that if he bawls out an official, chances are the subordinates of the latter would get a beating, and others down the line.

“‘Pag ako nagalit, siyempre conscious ako na yung under me mas galit at ‘yung under him lalong galit. Baka tingnan ko lang nang masama, sinampal na ng under me [‘yung tao niya], sinuntok, sinipa na. May control dapat ‘yon,” Aquino adds. “Kung ano gagawin ko, siyempre mama-magnify ng subordinate ko. Hindi puwede. Tiis ka.”

(When I get angry, of course I’m conscious that those under me would get angry, and those under him would get more angry. If I glared at the official, he might beat up the people under him. There should be some control. Whatever I do will be magnified by my subordinate. That can’t be. So I have to bear it.)

He cites a Palace meeting on government efforts in Ginsaugon, Saint Bernard town in Leyte, years after the 2006 landslide that buried an entire village. He got riled when an Office of Civil Defense (OCD) official prefaced every sentence with, “We hope, we believe, we think, we assume.” The official also presented wrong figures – a known pet peeve of Aquino, who keeps a calculator by his side to check questionable numbers.

After observing 5 mistakes in the OCD presentation, Aquino turned to the official who sat beside him. He put his hand behind the latter’s back.

Without raising his voice, he told him, as he gently rubbed the man’s back: “Buhay ng tao ito. Bakit puro ‘we hope, we believe, we assume, we think?’ If anything happens, you have to have the basics. Ilan ba ang tao diyan, ano ba ang kailangan nila?….’Pag nagkita naman tayo sa susunod, umpisahan mo naman dapat ng, ‘We know, we are sure, we have confidence.’ Di ba dapat ganyan yan, brod?”

(People’s lives are at stake here. Why is it all ‘we hope, we believe, we assume, we think?’ If anything happens, you have to have the basics. How many people are there, what do they need?…When we see each other again, preface your statements with ‘we know, we are sure, we have confidence.’ Shouldn’t it be like that, my friend?”)

Changed man

It is this power to demand instant solutions to problems that Aquino says he’ll miss the most when he’s no longer Chief Executive.

CABINET MEETING. President Benigno Aquino III presides over a Cabinet meeting at the Palace Aguinaldo State Dining Room on November 27, 2013. Photo from Malacañang Photo Bureau

“I’ll miss more than anything – you see a problem, you can call the agency directly and demand an action right away; an analysis of the problem and action. Perhaps at the most that would be it. May dumating, may lumapit sa iyo, may nagreklamo, reasonable ‘yung gusto nila (Somebody approaches you and complains, the request is reasonable). Then the process starts and ends rather quickly,” he says.

The outgoing president says when he was a senator, he had second thoughts about running for reelection because he was getting frustrated with pushing his advocacies. He was elected senator in 2007.

“There was a time when I was in the Senate, I was really wondering whether or not to even stand for reelection. The idea was you’re banging your head against the wall; it seems it would not achieve anything – fighting for all of the good causes. Then now, to be able to do everything you’ve been thinking about this country, you were able to do something about it in 6 years. You found answers to perpetual questions,” Aquino says.

How has the presidency changed him? Aquino charts his fate which started with his parents’ fight to regain Philippine democracy. 

“From my Dad’s solitary cell, to EDSA, and people trying to stop tanks that are even higher than them, to all the ingredients necessary for a bloody revolution being present, but we somehow avoided it. Those of a religious mind would think God had a part in it. And to now,” he says, referring to his presidency.

HIS DAD'S CELL. President Benigno Aquino III visits the detention cell of his father, the late senator Benigno 'Ninoy' Aquino Jr in Fort Bonifacio. Photo by Joseph Vidal/Malacañang Photo Bureau

Until he became Chief Executive, Benigno Aquino III was known only as the son of two Philippine icons of democracy. He did not stand out when he was a presidential son, seen at the time as an easygoing, average guy who did not fit the mold of a future leader.

In Congress, he remained low-key, quietly working under the long shadow cast by his parents. A former co-lawmaker, Health Secretary Janette Garin, says Aquino was not the kind of person who would seek out the media to boast about the work he had done on major legislation.

When it was his time to step up to the plate, Aquino was flushed out of the shadows. His parents' legacy illuminated him and might have even shielded him from some of the early blunders of his administration.

“There was a time somebody asked, ‘Ano bang papel mo?’ ‘E di dakilang alalay’ (‘What’s your role?’ ‘What else, a noble follower’). Because there was always some leader that I deferred to, to suddenly being the leader that everybody deferred to and everybody was looking to for all of the instant solutions yesterday," he says, still on his transformation over the last 6 years.

In his farewell addresses to different departments and offices in his final week as Chief Executive, Aquino has the same message: After his roller coaster of emotions over the last 6 years, he is getting off with a smile, his head held high.

Other exiting presidents would be having separation anxiety in the final months of their term – even earlier, when they begin to feel the full weight of their so-called lame-duck status. If Aquino feels any of this, he doesn't show it. And if he has any regrets about his presidency, he will probably just keep them to himself. Tiis lang. – Rappler.com 

DOJ under Duterte admin: Reform BuCor, New Bilibid Prison

$
0
0

MANILA, Philippines – Incoming Justice Secretary Vitaliano Aguirre II said that his priority under the administration of President-elect Rodrigo Duterte is to cleanse and reorganize the problem-plagued Bureau of Corrections (BuCor) – particularly the New Bilibid Prison (NBP) in Muntinlupa.

In an interview with Rappler on Thursday, June 23, Aguirre detailed his plans on solving issues within the NBP.

In the past, BuCor and the NBP made headlines due to issues of corruption, drug trade, and violence.

"Because of what's happening within BuCor, I think this will be the first mission which we'll accomplish," he said.

He plans to eliminate drug trading in prisons, especially since "about 75% of drug transactions are cooked in Muntinlupa" – mostly by detained Chinese druglords.

He explained that despite detention, drug transactions were still made possible by the use of cellphones inside.

"It's very clear that if we'll neutralize the use of cellphones, we'll neutralize drug transactions in Muntinlupa," he said.

Although jammers were already installed inside the NBP to eliminate drug transactions via cellphones, Aguirre admitted that the druglords have found ways to bypass them.

"After I found that out, I asked my friends who are techy and asked them to look for a jammer that can't be overcome by druglords. They're able to find one machine made in Israel costing P10 million. They said we're sure it won't be overcome," he narrated.

Where are they going to get the funds to purchase this device?

"I made an appeal to those who donated to Duterte [for his presidential campaign]. Since some of those who donated were rejected, they might as well donate to us for the jammers," he said.

Change personnel, infrastructure

Aguirre said that the NBP will go through a complete overhaul – something completely supported by Duterte and incoming Philippine National Police (PNP) chief Ronald “Bato” dela Rosa.

Within the institution, Aguirre said his plan is to change every "tainted" personnel and guard.

"They're only receiving around P11,000 to P14,000, that's why it's easy for some of them to be corrupted," he explained.

Aguirre's plan is to retrain the NBP personnel, and get PNP Special Action Force (SAF) members to temporarily stay in the NBP.

He also believes that the physical structure of the NBP should be modified, since it is "no longer appropriate for today's penal institution."

According to the International Centre for Prison Studies (ICPS), the Philippines has the fourth most overcrowded prison system in the world.

"I interviewed superintendents, and they proposed that the structure be destroyed, and we find a new one," he said.

There used to be a plan to transfer the NBP to a new institution in Nueva Ecija, with an allocated budget of P50 million.

However, Aguirre claimed that the plan was no longer pursued because the high cost for the new building was found to be overpriced.

"If we could just sell this Muntinlupa area, which is around 200 hectares, that would be enough to build a new building for prisoners," he said.

Anti-corruption

Stamping out corruption within the DOJ and its attached agencies is one of the main tasks of Aguirre as soon as he formally assumes his post as justice secretary.

"Unfortunately, because of big bureaucracy involved in DOJ all over the Philippines, corruption exists," he said.

Apart from BuCor, he also identified corruption involving public prosecutors, as well as in agencies such as the Bureau of Immigration and Board of Pardons and Parole.

Aguirre said that they are also looking at the possibility of increasing the salaries of those working for DOJ-attached agencies – similar to the earlier proposed salary increase for policemen. – Rappler.com

Aquino's satisfaction ratings decline: Not the worst

$
0
0

LAST FEW DAYS. President Benigno S. Aquino III is the guest of honor and speaker during the Ateneo de Manila university (ADMU) Loyola Schools 2016 Commencement ceremony on June 25, 2016. Photo by Gil Nartea/Malacañang Photo Bureau

MANILA, Philippines – President Benigno “Noynoy” Aquino III is about to conclude his 6-year term, during which time Filipinos saw how he performed.

A review of the President’s overall performance and trust ratings shows how these gradually slumped as he neared the end of his term.

Yet his lows are not the worst, especially when compared to the series of preceding presidential declines in history.

‘Honeymoon’ stage

According to polling firm Social Weather Stations (SWS), in the early months of his term, Aquino had a normal honeymoon with the public as he had his very first net satisfaction rating of 60% in September 2010. That rating increased 4 percentage points in November of the same year. 

This is no dfiferent from the net satisfaction ratings of previous presidents like Corazon Aquino who started with 53% in March 1986, and later surged to 72% in October; Fidel Ramos who started with 66% in September 1992 and increased to 69% in July 1993; Joseph Estrada, who rose from 60% in September 1998 to 67% in March 1999.

Aquino's early scores definitely fared better than former president Gloria Macapagal Arroyo who started with 24% in March 2001 and moved up slightly to 30% in March 2004.

From Social Weather Stations (SWS) 

Likewise, Aquino had the highest trust rating ever recorded in Pulse Asia’s trust surveys since 1999 with a staggering 85% as he began his 6-year term in June 2010.

According to the World Economic Forum (WEF), the country’s economic gain of 33 places since 2010 is the largest among all countries studied.

The President also noted that since the start of his leadership in 2010, the country has recorded an average goss domestic product (GDP) growth of 6.2%, the fastest average growth period in 40 years.

Shaken, not stirred

In the succeeding years, the trust dipped to more realistic levels, but without much difference. The trust ratings in the first quarter of the succeeding years were 75% in 2011, 69% in 2012, 72% in 2013, and 69% in 2014. 

In 2012, the Philippines recorded one of its strongest years for economic growth, surpassing all expectations in growth trends. Likewise, the first quarter GDP of 2013, was recorded at 7.8% which further raised the bar among different nations. 

Economic growth under the Aquino administration was one of the highlights of his presidency. But there were other main issues that caused a slight tug in the perception of his performance. 

  • Aquino vs Corona

In the first months of 2012, the whole country was focused on the impeachment trial of former Supreme Court chief justice Renato Corona since the President brought up the issue in a speech delivered at the Criminal Justice System summit in 2011. This was after the Corona court granted the Hacienda Luisita farmers the lands that had been denied them by the Aquino-Cojuangco clan.

Since then, Aquino’s ratings slowly dipped during Corona’s impeachment trial, despite his ratings gradually recovering in 2011. Complaints backed by the President’s allies in the House of Representatives triggered the impeachment. However, after Corona was convicted, Aquino’s ratings rose again.

Comparative disapproval ratings noted by Pulse Asia show a huge jump in Aquino's scores since the conflict between him and Corona. 

  

  • Pork barrel scam

Aquino’s ratings took a slight hit in the second half of 2013 when the pork barrel scam was exposed. This led to the detention of 3 senators and many other lawmakers under his administration due to plunder and graft cases. The event caused the President to abolish the graft-ridden Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF).

 

Comparative Pulse Asia trust ratings of Aquino from June to September 2013. 

 

Pulse Asia noted that there were no significant changes between June and September 2013 in the overall ratings of Aquino. But in the different geographic areas and socio-economic classes, a few marked movements were evident. 

Aquino received public criticism for the alleged “special treatment” he gave to suspected pork barrel scam mastermind Janet Lim Napoles who surrendered to him on August 28, 2013. Malacañang denied any special treatment and said the President agreed to Napoles' request that she surrender to him out of security considerations, and to find out the truth behind the biggest corruption scandal to hit the country in recent years.

  • The Zamboanga siege

In September 2013, the Zamboanga siege happened. Members of the Nur Misuari-led faction of the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF) attempted to take over the city. The siege lasted for over a month before the government finally declared they had overwhelmed rebel forces. 

The President himself was in Zamboanga for almost two weeks during the siege. He sent to Zamboanga City with Interior Secretary Manuel "Mar" Roxas, Fefense Secretary Voltaire Gazmin, and then Armed Forces chief General Emmanuel Bautista to help defuse the tension.

However, during the first week of the siege, Rappler reported that the chain of command wasn't as clear-cut. (READ: Zamboanga siege: Aquino says Roxas deserves praise)

Likewise, political groups and other organizations denounced the Aquino government for not taking the condition of Zamboanga City residents into consideration. The total damage caused by the siege was estimated at US$73.2 million, according to the government.

Following these incidents, Aquino's scores in the third quarter of 2013 were still positive. (READ: Aquino gets 'very good' grade in 2013 – SWS)

From SWS

 

  • Yolanda hits the Philippines

Surprisingly, when another crisis, Super Typhoon Yolanda (Haiyan), hit the country in November 2013, Aquino still got a “very good” +54 net satisfaction rating in the SWS December 11 to 16 survey. This, despite criticism from some parties on how the administration handled the relief operations. Yolanda victims comprised 13% of Filipino families who responded in the curvey.

The SWS also said that its survey showed that Aquino’s net satisfaction rating would have been net +48 instead of net +49 without the Yolanda victims. 

From SWS

Downhill

Surveys also noted the biggest drop in Aquino’s scores by 2014. The SWS June 2014 showed a 20-point drop, from +45 in March 2014 to +25 in June 2014. This was the first time that the administration received a “moderate” net satisfaction rating. 

From SWS

 

  • The controversial DAP

During this period, Aquino faced impeachment threats following the Supreme Court ruling that said the controversial Disbursement Acceleration Program (DAP) was unconstitutional. 

The DAP was used as a reform intervention to speed up public spending and boost economic growth. This gave Aquino and the executive branch power over public funds.

On July 4, 2014, the Department of Budget and Management released a statement in response to a report claiming that P352.7 billion was made available for the disposal of the executive exclusively for DAP projects.

Furthermore, a total of P136.75 billion – P65.59 billion from the 2011 budget and P71.16 billion from the 2012 budget – was made available for projects under DAP. It was also noted that the total amount used from the fund was actually P114.58 billion, according to the Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism

In a televised speech on July 14, 2014, Aquino responded to the Court's ruling and defended the now defunct DAP saying: “DAP is good. Our intentions, our processes, and the results were correct. Bosses, I promise you: I will not allow your suffering to be prolonged – especially if we could do what we can as early as now."

In his speech, he also attacked the SC, questioning how it arrived at such a controversial decision. 

Nonetheless, the issue made a dent on Aquino's popularity. In a Pulse Asia survey, Aquino's approval rating dropped to 56% on June 14, from a high of 70% on March 15, 2014.  

  

Aquino encounters a huge slump in SWS' June 2014 survey

 

  • A history of declines

Aquino seemed to be following a similar trend of decline in presidential ratings experienced by his predecessors.

His mother, Cory Aquino, also plummeted to a single-digit 7% in November 1990 (a year after the December 1989 coup, along with the other serious coup attempts) and failed to recover. 

President Fidel Ramos peaked at 69% in July 1993, but fell to a mere 1% in October 1995, when the country suffered a rice crisis.

Before Estrada was ousted from office in 2001, he plummeted to a 5% net satisfaction rating in the December 1999 and March 2000 surveys, according to SWS. This can be traced to the former president’s alleged involvement in the so-called "jueteng-gate" scandal.

Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo served as president for a total of 9 years – from 2001 to 2004 to fill in the unserved term of her ousted predecessor, and following her victory in the 2004 presidential race, from 2004 to 2010. She started with a +24 net satisfaction rating but ended with a -53 net rating near the end of her term, due to allegations of corruption and poll fraud.

  • Biggest downfall: Mamasapano

Aquino faced the lowest trust and approval ratings in his term – a staggering +11 net satisfaction rating in March amid outrage over the Mamasapano incident. (READ: The emotional journey of Benigno Aquino III)

One of the biggest factors that caused public outrage was the President’s absence at the arrival honors for the remains of 42 of the 44 fallen policemen at the Villamor Airbase on January 29, 2015. 

Many Filipino netizens slammed how Aquino handled the Mamasapano incident, and how he seemed to have washed his hands of the botched operation, based on his public explanation.

Netizens blast Aquino’s Mamasapano speech

 

A few months before Aquino’s term concludes, he gets the highest satisfaction ratings from the poorest Class E and the respondents from rural areas. The Visayas accounted for his highest satisfaction rating, based on geographical location, as of April 2016. However, Aquino's satisfaction ratings have dropped in the NCR region, Luzon, and Classes ABC. 

However, compared with the satisfaction ratings of past presidents since 1986, Aquino undoubtedly fared better, with a +27 net satistication rating as he ends his term. (READ: Aquino's firsts)

 

From SWS 

 

Meanwhile, Pulse Asia notes that Aquino still recorded gains in his trust ratings during the period February to March 2016.  

The surveys have shown that the satisfaction and trust in the performance of Philippine leaders tend to dip over time. But in a span of 6 years, Filipinos, in general,  have looked kindly upon Aquino’s presidency.

This year, Davao City Mayor Rodrigo Duterte gained millions of supporters to take the highest office in the country. How long will it take before he follows the historical declines of his predecessors? Rappler.com

Mary Gleefer Jalea is a Rappler intern.

Aquino's letdowns, Duterte's promise

$
0
0

MANILA, Philippines – When Benigno “Noynoy” Aquino III was swept to the presidency in 2010, it was an emotional nation that wanted to tell his predecessor Gloria Macapagal Arroyo in no uncertain terms it had had enough of corruption.

“Kung walang corrupt, walang mahirap” (No corruption, no poverty) was the slogan that fired the imagination of Filipino voters who were eager to see how things would change for the better under an Aquino presidency. Hopes were high and expectations were aching to be met. Noynoy Aquino at the time was the perfect antidote to the unpleasant memories of his predecessor.

Filipino voters were eager to welcome with open arms the country’s 3rd youngest president who ascended to power at age 50. Aquino’s campaigners echoed what they heard on the ground during the campaign. “Libre na ulit mangarap (We’re free to dream again),” one of Aquino’s supporters said, mirroring hope and anticipation.

In his 6 years as president, among Aquino’s biggest contributions to the country as president are perhaps the following: economic growth; anti-corruption efforts as seen in the removal of a tainted chief justice, quick decision by the courts on legislators and other personalities involved in the Priority Development Assistance Fund or pork barrel scam; passage of sin tax and reproductive health laws; the 4Ps (Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program); a consultative budget process; the draft Framework Agreement on the Bangsamoro which was unfortunately aborted; and even his own clean name and reputation.

His presidency carried a lot of promise, but like the other presidents who came before him, satisfaction by Filipinos dropped by the last semester of his administration.

Roots of disappointment

Notwithstanding the best of intentions, no president is perfect, to be sure. But through the years, disappointment with Aquino was fueled by 4 things:

  • Perceived inaction and inattention to urban woes in the National Capital Region which, in the end, gave him his highest dissatisfaction rating at 44%
  • Slow action in Leyte post-Yolanda
  • Lack of empathy as a leader
  • Difficulty distancing from classmates and personal friends

Foremost among the sources of frustration were mass transport, traffic, and flooding – failures in mass transport most evident and consistently seen in the regular breakdowns of MRT trains that crisscrossed EDSA.

The long lines of commuters taking the MRT and passengers walking gingerly on railroad tracks mirrored the utter helplessness of a government that was either powerless or did not care enough to quickly act on the problems of daily commuters.

Trains have been operating at an over-capacity of 142% since 2004, a problem he inherited but which he was unable to turn around. Once a sign of progress, MRT trains have deteriorated and become a daily symbol of government inaction and incompetence.

ANOTHER GLITCH. Just days into the new year, the overburdened MRT3 stalls twice in one day. File photo by Mark Saludes/Rappler

 

On top of this was the insufferable traffic that all Metro Manilans have had to endure. Countless studies have been made and estimates as of January 2016 said traffic in the metro is already costing the country about P3 billion daily ($64 million), equivalent to about 0.8% of gross domestic product, according to government figures.

Perennial, almost always lethal flooding that has resulted in traffic gridlock has only aggravated the situation in the metropolis. In recent years, the experience in the metro has been replicated even in Mindanao.

In 2011, for instance, according to statistics from the Emergency Events Database of the Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters, floods and storms cost the country $730 million and affected 11.6 million people and claimed over 1,900 lives. And this was two years even before Super Typhoon Yolanda hit the Philippines in 2013.

Nothing prepared Aquino and his commanders on the ground for the fury and destruction that Yolanda (internationally known as Haiyan) left behind. In 2015, the total damage to infrastructure caused by Yolanda was estimated at P17 billion, while 5.9 million workers lost their livelihood. World response was also astounding at P17 billion in total foreign aid received as of November 2015. But much more still needs to be done.

No empathy

Perhaps because it just isn’t his personality, or perhaps because it’s just how he copes with stress, Aquino was not known to be a leader with empathy. Empathy, according to the Harvard Business Review, enables those who possess it “to see the world through others’ eyes and understand their unique perspectives.”

Aquino failed to show this post-Mamasapano January 2015, when he chose to be absent during welcome honors for the slain police commandos. In a speech, he said, “I am saddened by the fact that, despite my effort to give the families space to grieve, as they were to meet their fallen loved ones for the first time, some people found fault in this by calling me cruel or without regard for such loss. My intention was to help them heal.”

SOMBER ARRIVAL. Members of elite Police Special Action Force carry the remains of 42 of their 44 comrades from three C-130 planes  at Villamor Airbase, Pasay City on January 29, 2015. File photo by Dennis Sabangan/EPA

 

He failed to see how his absence projected him instead as a cold and detached leader unable to feel the pain of family members left behind by victims of the bloody massacre. With a little over a year left in his presidency, the incident only alienated him further from his constituents.

Valuable ties

In a recent interview with Rappler, Aquino said, “Friendship stops when the country’s interest is at stake.” A bold declaration, it called to mind Transportation Secretary Jose Emilio “Jun” Abaya, former Philippine National Police chief Alan Purisima, Manila International Airport Authority General Manager Jose Angel Honrado, former Local Government Undersecretary Rico Puno, and former Land Transportation Office chief Virginia Torres who died from a heart attack.

Criticized for their failures as managers, Aquino had difficulty distancing himself from, and letting go of them. But the longer they stayed on, the more they diminished whatever political capital the administration had left.

By April 2016, Filipinos gave him a net satisfaction rating of 27% – lower compared to his previous rating of 32% in December 2015. But considering that his term as president is about to end, Aquino’s Social Weather Stations satisfaction rating is still relatively high, pollsters say.

During comparable time periods in their presidencies, former presidents Joseph Estrada, Fidel Ramos, and Corazon Aquino recorded net satisfaction ratings of +19%, +30%, and +13%, respectively. Gloria Macapagal Arroyo hit a dismal -53% with 3 months left in her presidency.

NEXT PRESIDENT. President-elect Rodrigo Duterte holds another early morning meeting in Hotel Elena in Davao City on May 29, 2016. File photo by Manman Dejeto/Rappler

 

Duterte’s promise

In the same Rappler interview, Aquino complimented the campaign of President-elect Rodrigo Duterte. The Davao mayor was clear on messaging and projected himself as both the opposite of Aquino and as the disruption of the continuity that administration candidate Mar Roxas symbolized.

Duterte promised action. He promised decisiveness. He promised an end in sight to the most debilitating problems that the country has seen in the last 6 years. He promised to be tough. Yet he showed empathy for OFWs affected by the bullet-planting operations at the airport. He promised higher wages for cops but threatened police generals who dabbled in drug-dealing.

He vowed an end to corruption, drugs, and crime. He cursed and hit the Church and its hypocrisy. He taunted the media and its corruption. Silently, even the politicians who were victims of these institutions applauded him.

He has pledged peace, moving to bring together to one table ageing communist negotiators and representatives of government. He has declared a "day of reckoning" for the terrorist and barbaric Abu Sayyaf Group.

The vote for Duterte was, in many ways, a protest vote. It was, as one pollster explained, an indicator of “discontent with the state of things.” The zealousness of those who supported him spread like wildfire on social media. It was sheer bandwagon and word of mouth, and “social media added fuel to the fire.”

People are weary of things remaining the same, but not necessarily angry with government, one pollster explained. 

The Philippine middle class is shrinking because many have opted to go abroad to either work or migrate, in search of a better future. Duterte gave himself a deadline – 3 to 6 months – to fix, or at the very least mitigate, the problems that have become a burden to most Filipinos.

He is the populist president-in-waiting who has promised to bring some deliverance to an undoubtedly tired and impatient people now on the lookout for quick fixes and short-term solutions. The runway Duterte laid out for himself is short and he knows he cannot afford to disappoint. 

Change is coming. Duterte is change. He is the promise all are eagerly waiting, desperately praying to be fulfilled. Rappler.com

Foe of big miners? Duterte is wedding ninong of mining heiress

$
0
0

CEBU PARTY. President-elect Rodrigo Duterte thanks supporters in Cebu after attending the wedding of his friend's daughter in Mactan on June 25, 2016. Photo by Jay Rommel Labra/EPA
"They are destroying the land. They are destroying Mindanao," President-elect Rodrigo Duterte said at his thanksgiving party in Davao City on June 6.

He told big mining firms: "All the big firms that have destroyed our land here, they will have to stop. They have to leave."

Mining stocks dropped after Duterte issued his warning against abusive firms and named Gina Lopez, an anti-mining advocate, as environment secretary. Are mining executives concerned about their future?

Cebu-based Fernando "Ding" Borja, president of Adnama Mining Resources, Incorporated (AMRI), may not be. 

Duterte, who Borja supported in Cebu during the presidential election, attended the wedding of the mining executive's daughter, Beatriz Amanda Borja, at the Shangri-La Mactan on June 25. He was one of her wedding ninongs (sponsors).

This was his first stop in the city before appearing at the Sugbo Grounds at the South Road Properties, the venue of a thanksgiving party for him.

AMRI is a company registered in Mandaue City, Cebu. The company's portfolio includes several mainly nickel mining projects in northern Mindanao, including a 1,000-hectare mine in Claver, Surigao Del Norte.

In his speech at the Davao City thanksgiving event, Duterte had cited Surigao Del Norte as one of the provinces that have been "destroyed" by mining.

While AMRI is just one of the mining companies operating in the province, MindaNews had reported that the company faced some controversy. According to MindaNews, in 2013, the Mamanwa tribe barricaded its nickel mine for non-payment of royalty fees. The barricade was removed after AMRI reportedly paid the tribe P10 million.

Beatriz Borja clarified to Rappler that the Manobos from Agusan and Surigao del Sur were the ones who put up the barricade "to force out the Mamanwas, who are the legitimate indigenous peoples of the area so they can collect the 1% share of gross revenue."

"Mamanwas, the natives of the area, have signed a contract with our company Adnama, and the National Commission on Indigenous Peoples. We did not pay the Manobos; as a matter of fact, we have filed cases against them," she said, adding that the Manobos "gave up" on the barricade as they knew they would not get paid.

Ding Borja played host to Duterte during his June 8 Cebu visit when Duterte met with newly-elected leaders of BOPK, the local alliance of Cebu City mayor-elect Tomas Osmeña. They met at the building of Borja's mining headquarters in Mandaue City.

Borja also sponsored a conference in Cebu last year when Duterte traveled the country campaigning for federalism, before he decided to run.

Duterte often boasts that he has rejected funding from several big businessman so he won't owe them any favors, and that he would not tolerate abusive mining companies. Would these same rules apply to his friends in the industry like Borja? – Rappler.com

Davao Death Squad: What ever happened to the investigations?

$
0
0

GONE. Clarita Alia, 62, who lost 4 sons to what she and human rights groups believe were the death squads, shows pictures of them at home in Davao City on May 8, 2016. Photo by Noel Celis/AFP

MANILA, Philippines – The presidential bid of Rodrigo Duterte successfully hinged on a vision of a peaceful and crime-free Philippines.

Throughout the campaign period, the president-elect did not hold back in his tirades against criminals before huge crowds of supporters. After all, in a country where people need to always be on guard to avoid being a victim, a promise to suppress crime in 3 to 6 months is music to the ear. (READ: Dissecting and weighing Duterte’s anti-crime strategy)

But what got the ire of most people, however, were Duterte's alleged human rights violations, specifically reported extrajudicial killings.

Duterte has also constantly been haunted by the shadow of the Davao Death Squad (DDS) – a vigilante group that international human rights groups alleged to have carried out extrajudicial killings when Duterte was mayor of Davao City.

Such allegations were hurled at Duterte even before his presidential candidacy. He, however, has constantly denied any involvement with the vigilante group, even challenging his critics to directly file a case against him. (READ: Duterte: ‘Am I the death squad? True’)

Duterte even pointed out, in one campaign sortie, that Senator-elect and former justice secretary Leila de Lima failed to file a case against him.

As Commission on Human Rights (CHR) chairperson then, De Lima initiated a probe into the Davao City mayor’s involvement with the DDS, which has been accused of carrying out at least 1,000 summary killings.

In 2012, CHR released a resolution stating that it found “probable cause” and recommended that the Office of the Ombudsman investigate the “possible administrative and criminal liability” of Duterte in relation to the numerous killings under his watch as Davao City mayor.

Tuesday, June 28, marks the fourth year since the CHR resolution on the DDS was released. What has happened since? 

CHR findings on DDS

In 2009, CHR conducted public hearings in Davao City on the killings between 2005 to 2009 attributed to the DDS.

It identified 206 deaths attributable to the DDS within this period – with 157 victims shot. 

At least 107 victims between 2005 to 2009 had records or were suspected to have been involved in illegal activities. However, there were several instances of mistaken identity. 

A report by Human Rights Watch (HRW) in 2009 identified Jaypee Larosa as a victim of mistaken identity.

MISTAKEN. Unidentified gunmen shot 20-year-old Jaypee Larosa in Davao City in 2008. Photo courtesy of Human Rights Watch

The 20-year-old was gunned down on July 17, 2008 by “three men in dark jackets who had arrived on a motorcycle" while he was in a neighbor Internet cafe. 

However, according to witnesses, one gunman was overheard saying in Filipino, “Son of a bitch, this is not the one.” Larosa, a young man with no criminal record and who lived in one of Davao City's quiet residential neighborhoods, was reportedly mistaken for a suspected robber.

The roster of victims also included minors, including 3 of Clarita Alia's 4 sons. 

Alia narrated to HRW that her 4 sons – 18-year-old Richard, 17-year-old Christopher, 14-year-old Bobby, and 15-year-old Fernando – were killed one after another between July 2001 and April 2007.

CHR also found a “distinct pattern” of killings – victims “usually involved or suspected to have been involved” in illegal activities were gunned down by men riding motorcycles.

Despite this, Duterte denied that the killings were carried out by a particular group. He said that any government employee or military/police personnel involved were doing it on their own.

However, the use of .45 caliber handguns – which are “expensive” – was an indication of the “officially-sanctioned character of the killings,” according to the United Nations (UN) Special Rapporteur on the Extrajudicial, Summary, or Arbitrary Executions.

Despite constant denial and “dearth of evidence to support a finding of direct compliance,” the Commission pointed out the “systematic failure” of local government officials and police to conduct in-depth investigations into the local killings. 

In fact, a senior police officer told CHR, only 24.59% percent of killings between January and August 2009 were “solved.”

The CHR resolution concluded that the local government is liable as it did not adopt reasonable measures despite knowledge of “a real and immediate threat.”

'The continuing pattern of killings and the failure to conduct a meaningful investigation of such incidents can be construed as tolerance on the part of the authorities of the crimes, thereby contributing to the climate of impunity.'

Commission on Human Rights on the Davao Death Squad

As the local chief executive and deputized National Police Commission (Napolcom) representative, Duterte “clearly disregarded” the information available on the killings committed in his jurisdiction. 

“The continuing pattern of killings and the failure to conduct a meaningful investigation of such incidents can be construed as tolerance on the part of the authorities of the crimes, thereby contributing to the climate of impunity,” the CHR added. 

As early as 2005, even the US embassy had taken notice of the rise of vigilante killings in several areas in the Philippines – specifically in Davao City and Cebu City. Based on what the embassy had heard, the report said the killings “seem very popular with the publics in Davao and Cebu.”

The report also said, “Mayors Duterte and [Tomas] Osmeña clearly condone the killings – which have not hurt their political standing in the slightest and apparently given them some bounce in popularity.”

Investigations closed in Ombudsman?

The CHR came up with recommendations based on the results of its probe. However, 4 years on, little is known about what happened since.

The Office of the Ombudsman, according to the CHR in its resolution, should investigate the “possible administrative and criminal liability of Duterte for his inaction in the face of evidence of numerous killings committed in Davao City and his toleration of the commission of those offenses.”

Prior to the CHR resolution, the Office of the Ombudsman in March 2012 found 21 police officers guilty of simple neglect of duty in relation to the vigilante killings, recommending penalties ranging from one month suspension to a fine equivalent to a month's salary. 

According to the Ombudsman, the "unusually high number of unsolved killings" was evidence that the local police force were "remiss in their duty." (READ: Ombudsman suspends cops for 'Davao Death Squad' killings)

However, in a statement released in 2015, HRW hit the Ombudsman for limiting its investigations to the police officers implicated "and not Duterte himself."

But according to a letter sent to CHR by the Office of the Ombudsman dated January 15, 2016 obtained by Rappler, the investigations on the DDS have been "closed and terminated."

The final disposition approved by the Overall Deputy Ombudsman Melchor Arthur H. Carandang said that "no evidence was gathered to support the killings attributed or attributable to the DDS." The Office of the Ombudsman also said that the allegations remain as "chismis and other gossips."

DOJ: ‘Difficult to do anything’

CHR recommended through the 2012 resolution the conduct of a “serious, impartial, and effective investigation” by several government agencies into the deaths attributed to the DDS to prosecute people responsible. 

These investigations, the commission added, should include the “possible omissions, negligence, and obstructions of justice” done by the local government officials and police force.

In May 2016, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that the probe had halted as the sole witness had left the government’s Witness Protection Program (WPP).

Outgoing justice secretary Emmanuel Caparas said “it’s very difficult to do anything” about the case unless the person resurfaced. (READ: DOJ halts probe into Davao Death Squad)

"It's very difficult to proceed on that basis," he said in a press conference in May. "There are affidavits but if you want to confirm the affidavit, you have to talk to the witness. But the witness is not there."

De Lima, meanwhile, said on May 22 that the witness had asked to leave the program when she stepped down from office in October 2015.

The decision of the witness, according to the senator-elect, was “definitely in reaction to Duterte’s victory.”

Probing DDS under the new admin

HRW expressed its dismay over the slow progress of the investigations on the DDS and condemned the “long official tolerance" of the president-elect's stance on the killings even before the election period.

“The long official tolerance of Duterte’s advocacy of summary killings as effective crime-fighting strategy needs to stop,” HRW deputy Asia director Phelim Kine said in a statement.

“The government should send an unambiguous message to Duterte and other officials that support for extrajudicial killings results in an investigation – not in speaking tours.” 

But despite the allegations, incoming Justice Secretary Vitaliano Aguirre II, who was the lawyer of the president-elect when the probe into the DDS was being held, insisted that the government then wasn’t able to prove any links between Duterte and the DDS.

Nothing was proven to be the work of the policemen, much less of Mayor Duterte. Mahina ang case o walang case at all. They were not able to prove anything.

– Incoming Justice Secretary Vitaliano Aguirre II

Despite setbacks, CHR's Gascon said it is still a “live case” despite the lack of a witness. He gave assurances they will continue to follow up with the DOJ.

“We anticipate that perhaps the case with the DOJ will be put in the back for until such time that evidence is uncovered because I think one of the reasons why the case has not been closed is they are looking for a particular key witness – a whistle blower, someone who has been involved in some of those deaths,” he told Rappler. “I understand that this witness has become scarce.”

“But it’s still a live case and it hasn’t progressed to the stage of filing of charges because the prosecutors need to have a strong case when they file,” Gascon added. 

A special investigation team, however, still exists to continue investigating the alleged killings after Duterte's statements during his campaign. (READ: Duterte: I killed 700? No, make that 1,700)

This team, according to Gascon, is now part of a bigger Special Task Force on Extrajudicial Killings set by the CHR amidst the rising number of deaths across the country. 

CRIME-FREE. President-elect Rodrigo Duterte's campaign focused on presenting a vision of a peaceful and crime-free Philippines no matter what it takes. Photo by Manman Dejeto/Rappler

Vigilance against crimes 

Only a month after Davao City's "The Punisher" won the Philippine presidential elections with at least 14 million votes, killings of suspected drug peddlers in different parts of the country have become rampant.

According to the Philippine National Police (PNP), 29 suspects were killed in anti-illegal drug operations from May 9 to June 15, while 39 deaths were recorded from January 1 to May 9

REGIONJanuary 1 - May 9, 2016May 9 to June 15, 2016TOTAL
III131225
IVA8614
VII055
IX022
X101
XI10010
XII448
NIR101
NCR202
TOTAL392968

The victims engaged in shoot-outs with law enforcers, the PNP added. 

Meanwhile, 3,760 people have been arrested in various anti-illegal drug operations across the Philippines from May 10 to June 15, 2016. 

Given Duterte's pronouncement that he will grant presidential pardon to law enforcers convicted of killing criminals and civilians in the line of duty, can we expect the number of casualities to shoot up in the next 6 years? – Rappler.com


Who wants to take on metro traffic? Alberto Lina says he's up to it

$
0
0

TRAFFIC CZAR? Customs chief Alberto Lina says he's willing to tackle Metro Manila's traffic problem. Photo from bertlina.com

Traffic in Metro Manila is a headache for everyone: the everyday commuter who wastes two to three hours on the road, business owners who incur heavy productivity losses, and government officials who become the frequent target of attacks for failing to solve the capital region's congestion woes.

But there's one government official who says he's willing to take on the challenge and become Metro Manila's traffic czar.

“I will, because in my heart I want to help this country,” said Customs chief Alberto Lina, in a light moment with several reporters.

Lina, who is due to step down as commissioner soon, said he is interested to try to untangle the metro's traffic mess using his background and experience in business, logistics, and government.

If given the job, Lina said his priorities include improving the public transport system, lifting the number coding system, clearing illegally parked vehicles and sidewalk vendors, and rationalizing the bus system.

Asked if he can address the traffic problem, Lina gave a confident "Yes" – but he was quick to add that he would not apply for the position unless incoming President Rodrigo Duterte offers him the job.

He also said that the new president should be given emergency powers to solve the traffic problem, which cost the Philippines P2.4 billion a year in productivity losses, according to a study by the Japan International Cooperation Agency.

Lina also said that the transportation department and the newly-created Department of Information and Communication Technology should work together to address metro traffic.

The outgoing customs commissioner is set to be replaced by former Marine Captain Nicanor Faeldon.

Lina assumed the top post at the Bureau of Customs in April 2015, after a brief 5-month stint as Customs commissioner in 2005 during the administration of former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo. – Rappler.com

Rody Duterte: The man, the mayor, the president

$
0
0

“Ikaw ang pangulo para sa pagbabago… Sawa na ang bayan ko sa magnanakaw na tao.”

(You are the president for change... My country is tired of people who steal.)

These are the first lines of folk musician Freddie Aguilar’s song for President-elect Rodrigo Duterte. It plays inside Duterte’s pick-up truck one night in Davao City after one of his post-elections late-night press conferences.

The campaign season, the time when this song could be heard everywhere, is over. Duterte has won the presidential elections by a landslide with 16.6 million votes, the first such victory for a Mindanaoan.

But Duterte can’t seem to let this song go. A few days later, he plays it again in the middle of another press briefing. He asks for silence. What are his marching orders for his Cabinet? Just listen to this song, he says.

As it plays, Duterte, alone in the table in front, rests his head upon his hands.

To hear this song is to be transported back to his Miting de Avance in Luneta on May 7.

That night, some 600,000 people filled the park. A giant flag was passed around as Duterte clutched a smaller flag to his chest and, with tears in his eyes, declared, “It will be only one Filipino nation.”

To hear this song is to be reminded that Duterte has become a symbol.

To his supporters, he is the catalyst for change. He is the anger vote against the supposedly blundering Aquino administration. He holds the torch for Mindanao and Visayas against “imperial Manila.” He is the strong leader with a soft heart. He is the ordinary man against the oligarchs, the crime-fighter, the benevolent dictator, the savior. 

{source}
<wide-image>
<bg-image style="background: url('http://assets.rappler.com/799FE5F8999D46C7BD12DB0B635B7D8B/img/B90E190F85434F5CB4F0053AB0E73E3F/epa-20160507-duterte-miting-avance-002.jpg');">
</bg-image>

</wide-image>
{/source}

Supporters of Davao City Mayor Rodrigo Duterte react during the 'miting de avance' in Manila, Philippines, May 7, 2016. Ritchie B. Tongo/EPA

 

The adoration of his supporters is matched only by the revulsion of his critics. To them, he is a threat to democracy, a sexist punk, a man for whom nothing is holy. He is the cold-blooded murderer whose respect for human rights is a self-admitted cop-out. He is a symbol, not so much of hope, as of despair, the vote of people so jaded they can no longer tell good change from bad.

Duterte is about to take on an even more symbolic role. On June 30, his oath-taking as the 16th president of the Philippines will make him the father of the country, the first Mindanaoan president, the man at the helm of a nation leaving behind "Daang Matuwid" territory.

But symbols don’t lead countries. Fallible men do. Duterte is every inch as flawed as the next man, as he so often reminds us.

So who is this man they call Rody Duterte?


The Bisaya

A map of how all regions in the country voted last May 9 shows Duterte won in most of Mindanao and in major regions in the Visayas like Cebu (53% of all votes) and Bohol (49.5%). 

Anyone who followed him around as he campaigned in these regions won’t be surprised by this turn-out.

Duterte bewitched these regions with his naughty humor, infectious anger, irresistible promise of “true” change, and most importantly, the durable roots that tie him to their people.

Duterte branded himself as the Bisaya and the Mindanaoan rolled into one and he could do this credibly because of his parents.

THE DUTERTES. A young Rody Duterte (second from left) poses for a photo with his parents and siblings. Photo from Davao City government

His father Vicente comes from Danao, Cebu, and his mother Soledad is a Maranao born in Agusan del Norte.

Representative of millions of Filipinos, the Duterte family were migrants. Vicente moved his family from Cebu to Southern Leyte before finally settling in Davao.

Rody himself was born in Maasin, Southern Leyte and stayed there until he was around 6 years old. He still recalls the smell of copra roasting in the sun as he and his friends passed by fields aboard open-air trucks.

Aside from bequeathing Rody with multi-rootedness, his parents gave him his first experience of politics and public service.

When the Cebuano Vicente decided to run for governor of the undivided Davao, he gave his 18-year-old son Rody the task of accompanying him during his campaign sorties all over the province.

Rody took his first step in the campaign trail, going from barangay to barangay talking to people from all walks of life.

“He was talking to the barangays already at the time. It was his job to deliver whatever it is, or anything that has to do with the elections,” said Jocellyn Duterte, Rody’s youngest sister who was another of their father’s campaign companions.

Vicente’s succeeding terms as governor increased Rody’s exposure to public service and the life of a politician.

Those days, the Duterte home on Talisay Street was an “open house,” shared Jocellyn. She remembers waking up in the morning to see long lines of people at the front door waiting to speak to her father.

“They would be asking for a job or money to help bury a dead relative. Those days, we were face to face with the masses,” she said.


“Can you embrace the poor and the sick?” This question, Duterte claims, has guided him throughout his life in politics.


These long lines of people would be replicated decades later in the lines that form every night outside Duterte’s own office in Davao City Hall where he personally listened to concerns of the supplicants – from excessive electric bills to cases of domestic violence.

Duterte admitted during one episode of his weekend television show, Gikan sa Mara, Para sa Masa, that his father, upon hearing his son considering a career in politics, posed a question to him: “Can you embrace the poor and the sick?”

This question, Duterte claims, has guided him throughout his life in politics.

Lilian Abella, the next-door neighbor of the Dutertes when they first settled in Davao City, described Vicente as a “very good and humble man” who was known for being pro-poor.

Lilian, a year younger than Rody, saw glimpses of the governor in his eldest son.

She remembers the teenage Duterte as the helpful son of their influential neighbors.

As she would pass by their house on her way back home from school, he would be seated in the driveway, smoking a cigarette beside his jeep.

Then a high school student at an exclusive girl’s school, Lilian would bow her head and hide her face behind her hair, knowing Rody to be something of a bad boy.

But inevitably, Rody would call out to her, “Day, day, day!” to which she would reply, “What is it?”

“Your mother is not home. I brought her to the hospital,” he would say, before taking another drag from his cigarette.

That was around the time Lilian’s mother started having heart problems. From then on, it was always Rody who would bring her to the hospital using his trusty jeep.

But if Rody’s populist leadership style and soft heart for the masses came from his father, his fighting spirit came from his mother Soledad or “Nanay Soleng,” said Lilian.

“Nanay Soleng was the one who really molded Rody to be the feisty character that he is now, a go-getter,” said Abella.

One of the foremost women activists and philanthropists in Davao City at the time, Soledad was the type of woman you dare not cross.

Rody, one of the few who did dare, was often the object of her ire. Infractions like coming home past his curfew or playing tricks on his siblings would land him in front of the family crucifix, staring at Jesus for hours with his arms spread out, or kneeling on monggo (mung bean) seeds. (READ: Rody Duterte: The rebellious son, the prankster brother)

Their strong personalities boomeranging off one another would eventually give Rody the kind of character that would make him a bull-headed leader.

“In the mayor’s character, you will see the toughness of the mother,” said Jocellyn.


If Rody’s populist leadership style and soft heart for the masses came from his father Vicente, his fighting spirit came from his mother Soledad.


Rody’s intractability was why telecommunication companies had to give in to his demand for a 911 emergency hotline for Davao City. With threats and the strength of his personality, he forced a landgrabber to chew and swallow dubious land ownership documents on national television.

Duterte is an impatient man who wants high-impact results. As such, City Hall staff know that, with him, everything is urgent. 

His determination to get what he wants extends to matters of the heart.

One story he likes to tell his children is how he courted his ex-wife, Elizabeth Zimmerman. He saw her at a public market and was impressed to see a beautiful mestiza in such a setting. The besotted Duterte followed her home only to encounter the fierce family guard dog at the gate. 

Determined not to miss this chance to talk to Elizabeth, Duterte allegedly poisoned the guard dog.

In Duterte’s toughness and single-mindedness, many voters saw hope for a more disciplined citizenry and perhaps a leader with the grit to truly turn things around.

“I will do it, pero putang-ina sumunod kayo (but, mother fucker, you better follow)” he would say in his campaign speeches after raising a clenched fist.

This do-it-or-die attitude is what citizens are now counting on to fix such deep-seated problems as crime, drugs, corruption, poverty, and Metro Manila traffic.


Defying definition

It’s not far-fetched to say Duterte’s unconventionality won him the seat in Malacañang. 

Filipino voters love to be refreshed by the new and different, just as much as they easily tire of a mold. 

Duterte is as out-of-the-box as one can be, at least, on the surface. 

He has committed what would normally be considered political suicide, from cursing a beloved Pope to admitting womanizing tendencies, to giving lighthearted accounts of rape– except he survived all these “blunders.”

The fact that such a man has won the presidency challenges Filipinos’ definition of a politician and renders the already colorful national political scene in unheard-of hues.

{source}
<wide-image>
<bg-image style="background: url('http://assets.rappler.com/941C0BD160E54DCF825D81D5E23E7514/img/66D1D16D4165405194950EA0511C76C0/Duterte-Sorti-Amoranto-LRED-20140412-004.jpg');">
</bg-image>

</wide-image>
{/source}

SPEAKING HIS MIND. Rody Duterte speaks to supporters during a campaign concert in Quezon City on April 12 when he makes the controversial comment on rape. Photo by Alecs Ongcal/Rappler

 

Even his presidential campaign was “unorthodox,” spending relatively small amounts on television and radio advertisements, but going all-out on social media, thanks to his army of online supporters.

As president-elect, he continued to lengthen his string of firsts by not attending his own proclamation and by holding his inauguration separate from that of Vice President Leni Robredo.

Duterte doesn’t only like to do things his way, he loves to defy all definitions.

At one point in his life, he was known as the “governor’s son.”

But far from being the prim and proper scion, Rody was a rebel who got into fights and took 7 years to finish high school. 

Jesus Dureza, Duterte’s high school friend and now incoming peace process adviser, remembers a teenage Rody who loved to intervene when there was trouble.

At the Holy Cross Academy of Digos where the two met (after Duterte was expelled from Ateneo de Davao High School), there would always be a “rambulan” (fist fight) in the evenings. 

Nakikialam ‘yun ‘pag may nanggugulo. Sa gabi, lalabas siya, hanapin niya kung sino nanggulo kagabi at aawayin niya then uwi lang siya,” said Dureza.

(He would interfere when there was someone looking for a fight. At night, he would come out and look for whoever was picking a fight, then he would fight them then go home.)


Duterte doesn’t only like to do things his way, he loves to defy all definitions.


Jocellyn called her older brother “astig.” When they were teenagers, he would barge in on parties she was attending with his bodyguards in tow and demand loudly that she go home. 

Saan na ‘yung kapatid ko? Pinapauwi na ng tatay ko!” Jocellyn remembers the young Duterte shouting. (Where is my sister? My dad wants her to go home!)

The music would stop and the party would be disrupted. Jocellyn and Rody would spend the entire car-ride home fighting.

Duterte loved to do the extraordinary and unexpected.

Dureza recalled how Duterte would fly a light plane over the school parade ground while the school band was playing to show off his newly-minted pilot skills.

Those days, Duterte was smitten with a pretty canteen vendor named Pilang. Whenever he would come over to her stall to buy a Coke, he would try to grab her from behind the counter. Pilang always managed to move beyond his reach.

One Saturday, he again flew his plane over the school and even made it dive a few times.

After landing, he came over to Pilang and said in Bisaya, “If you don’t give me an answer, next Saturday I’ll be here again. I’ll make my plane dive but I’ll make it crash so we both die.”

Until now, that rebellious governor’s son continues to stretch confines and challenge expectations.

He’s a Leftist but with strongman tendencies. He’s a sexist but a mayor who has implemented some of the best pro-women policies in local government. He’s a professed stickler for the law but has advocated mass murder (though he’ll say, it was just a joke). He was Mindanao’s first choice for president, but he was Metro Manila’s first choice as well.


Davao City’s champion

But beneath that bombastic personality is a consummate politician.

Duterte has been a public official for over 20 years and he has not lost a single election in his life. He didn’t achieve that simply by being shocking (although it helped).

His first foray into public service was as a city prosecutor in the 1980s. 

Retired police general Rodolfo “Boogie” Mendoza Jr, who was a lieutenant assigned in Davao in the 1970s to 1990s, described Duterte then as a “smart-ass” who “appeared to be very sure of himself.”

In 1986, after the fall of the Marcos dictatorship, Duterte was appointed officer-in-charge vice-mayor by President Corazon Aquino. 

The first-time local government executive was fond of visiting all the barangays, casually chatting with residents and grabbing a snack with barangay officials, much like he used to do when he was his father’s campaign substitute.

Veteran photojournalist Rene Lumawag first met Duterte when he was vice-mayor. The politician struck the photographer as just “an ordinary person.”

“At first, you didn’t see the iron fist. I thought he was just a traditional politician,” Lumawag told Rappler.

Veteran local journalist Vic Sumalinog thinks it was Duterte’s people skills that got him elected as mayor for the first time in 1988. His familiarity with the locals and his easy-going personality gave him the edge over his opponent Zafiro Respicio.

DAVAO'S MAN. Rodrigo Duterte takes his oath as Davao City mayor on the steps of Davao City Hall. Photo from Davao City government

Duterte’s 1988 victory as Davao City mayor would soon put to test all his cunning and people skills.

For Davao then was a no-man’s land. Communists, citizen armies, police, and military were fighting to the death in its streets. Older Davaoeños remember a time when they were too scared to leave their homes. Some were forced to migrate to other cities.

The 43-year-old mayor had one goal in mind those days: to free Davao City from armed struggle. He had one ace up his sleeve: his familiarity with Left ideology from his college days. 

He was then already friends with Leftists like former NPA rebel Leoncio Evasco (who would become his chief of staff and is now incoming Cabinet Secretary) and Erasto “Nonoy” Librado, secretary-general of Kilusang Mayo Uno.

Boogie Mendoza called Duterte in those days a “strategic ally” of the Left. This alliance allowed Duterte to strike a deal with communists that they leave Davao City alone.


Duterte fears betrayal above all.


At the same time he was dealing with communists, Duterte was winning the loyalty of law enforcers like the police and military. He had institutionalized incentives for them and struck dependable friendships in which he readily assisted them with things like medical expenses. (READ: Dissecting and weighing Duterte's anti-crime strategy)

Jocellyn credits Duterte’s easy rapport with police and military to his youthful days spent in the company of his and his father’s bodyguards. It helps that Duterte is fond of guns and motorcycles.

It was in Duterte’s mayorship that the disciplinarian in him surfaced, said Lumawag.

Unti-unting lumilitaw na ‘yung kanyang pagkatao na, galit siya, nagtitimbag ‘yan kung magalit,” he said, describing Duterte’s angry look as a hardening of facial features and body stance. (Bit by bit, his anger would surface, it would gather up inside him.)

Duterte was particularly vexed by injustice or arrogance. 

Lumawag remembers Duterte stopping in his tracks whenever he saw a driver parked where he was not supposed to.

Duterte would grab the driver’s shirt near the waist, along with the flabs of the driver if he was on the chubby side, and whisper harshly, “Ano ba (What’s this)?”

Aboard his black pick-up truck, Duterte would also run after drivers with burning cigarettes between their fingers in order to impress upon them Davao City’s laws prohibiting smoking in public places, including the streets.

WITH THE PEOPLE. Duterte listening to a Davao City resident in his office. Photo by Davao City Government

One time, he was visited in his office by the wife of a policeman who complained that her husband was keeping his monthly salary to himself.

Duterte called the policeman in and told him, “From now on, your salary will go to your wife. Ma’am, give him some money every now and then.”

Today, Davao City is not only much safer, it’s also more vibrant and prosperous. If its many citations and awards don’t impress you, then perhaps the feeling of well-being while walking through its orderly streets will.

But the best testimonial on Duterte’s mayorship comes from Davaoeños themselves. A survey conducted by the Ateneo de Davao University from May 25-30 among Davao residents found that 99% of respondents were satisfied with Duterte’s leadership. In the May 9 elections, 96.6% of Davaoeños voted him for president.

Of course, Davao City is still far from perfect. Citizens complain of a widening gap between the rich and poor. In nearby Samal Island, foreigners are still kidnapped. Drugs and crime still taint some communities. Citizens took to the streets when Duterte allowed the construction of a coal-fired power plant. And there are the so-called Davao Death Squads, widely believed to be Duterte's extreme solution to crime, which have haunted the city's streets.

But overwhelmingly, citizens trust their local government. It’s a trust Duterte has fostered for more than two decades. 


The secret Duterte

Who is the real Duterte? 

Is the man we see cursing on national television and whistling at female reporters the real deal? 

His close associates say it’s almost impossible to read Duterte’s public persona. Out of 10 public statements he gives, often only one is true, said someone he worked closely with in City Hall.

Duterte is skilled at evading questions he deems sensitive, hiding his real intentions through jokes or deflecting attention back to the questioner.

READING DUTERTE'S MIND. Duterte speaks at a business forum at The Manila Peninsula Hotel in April 2016. Photo by Alecs Ongcal/Rappler

Asked by a reporter about his health during a press conference, Duterte shot back with a challenge: “If I can run on my treadmill for an hour-and-a-half, you resign from your job. I’m serious. Let’s go to my house now.”

It was far from a straightforward answer, but the reporter, after a few feeble comebacks, did not bring up the issue again.

Like any politician of the Machiavellian mold, Duterte knows all about power play and how to use situations to his advantage.

For instance, he tests the mettle of the people around him.

“He subjects people around him to random tests without them knowing that they are being tested. He wants to see how people would react and handle things given a particular situation,” shared Patmei Ruivivar, his former chief of staff for 7 years.

Duterte might even start a rumor just to conduct a loyalty check or “tempt” you with offers to see what your weaknesses are. (READ: 4 lessons about Rodrigo Duterte, the boss)

“Don’t worry, he will not judge you. He will only use that information in deciding where you can best be useful to him and his mission,” said Ruivivar.

Another of his City Hall associates said, in times of disagreement, he will let his companions argue it out, only for him to intervene “like a Messiah” to resolve the conflict.

He has a limited circle of people who have his ear but it’s a multi-disciplinary group that helps him digest issues like foreign affairs, the economy, and infrastructure.

To this group, he will “float” ideas and think out loud. But he spends time alone to make the final decisions.

Ruivivar described Duterte as “very self-aware.” He knows his weaknesses and is not above asking for help from people smarter than him.

But you’ll very rarely hear him utter the word “sorry” with humility. A family friend of his said he will not apologize outright but might, without warning, change his erroneous or hurtful behavior.

Ruivivar attributes his Machiavellian tendencies to the political fate of his father Vicente. Governor Duterte died a “broken-hearted man,” according to Jocellyn.

In fact, he died of a heart attack in court while hearing a case against him. At the time of his death, Vicente lost his place in the local political scene in Davao after his stint in national politics as head of General Services (today’s Interior Department) under then president Ferdinand Marcos.

He also had a falling-out with his best friend and political ally Alejandro “Landring” Almendras.

Vicente’s death affected Rody profoundly, said Jocellyn. It was then that Rody shaped up and took his law studies seriously.

The sad note with which his father’s political career ended and his sudden death that eliminated the possibility of a comeback continues to haunt Duterte to this day. It is what motivates him to keep a close eye on his people, said Ruivivar. 

Duterte fears betrayal above all and will do everything in his power to preserve the people’s faith in him.


‘Mayor of the Philippines’

Davaoeños and his friends, when they hear about his most recent antic, will only sigh or chuckle and say, "That’s just the way he is."

Duterte is 71 years old, making him the oldest president this country has ever had. He’s not likely to change his ways anytime soon.

This understandably frustrates those who expect a leader to change for them, to bend to the will of the people.

But it’s this same inflexibility that attracts believers who want a leader who will do everything he can to keep his promises. 

And what are these promises? Suppression of crime, drugs, and corruption in 3 to 6 months; a more prosperous Mindanao; peace with communist and Moro rebels, a federal system of government for the country; and much more.

He said, “I cannot make this country a heaven on earth but I can assure the Filipino a comfortable life.”

{source}
<wide-image>
<bg-image style="background: url('http://assets.rappler.com/87D2ED9A4C5F44538DEC7E740F102273/img/048916C462D0400A8A4CEF3FD7176E2D/duterte-angeles-city-rally-20160321-002.jpg');">
</bg-image>

</wide-image>
{/source}

CRAZY CROWDS. Duterte walks through a sea of people during a sortie in Angeles, Pampanga in March 2016. Photo by Duterte-Cayetano Media Team

 

Duterte's governance style, based on his mayorship, is one focused on getting high-impact results. He wants things felt and experienced by the masses.

This explains the regular distributions of rice packs that take place in front of Davao City Hall. Davao City is also perhaps among the country’s cities with the most ubiquitous traffic lights.

Duterte is a leader prone to extremes and prefers system overhauls if he can get it.

In the 90s, during a conversation about irregularities in the national government, Lumawag asked the mayor what he would do about the problem if he were president.

Duterte supposedly replied, “‘Yung basket ng prutas, huwag mo lang pipili-piliin ‘yung masama. Talagang ibuhos mo.” (If you have a basket of fruits, don’t just pick out the bad ones, pour all the fruits out.)

Duterte is a "consultative" leader, said barangay captain and former city councilor Angela Librado-Trinidad.

He would get weekly feedback straight from Davao citizens through his weekend show, Gikan Sa Masa, Para Sa Masa. Calls of citizens would inform policies like the city’s car speed limit, smoking ban, liquor ban, and fireworks ban.

For the business sector, he has championed anti-red-tape policies, ensuring permits are processed within a 72-hour period. His guiding principle is that government should stay out of the business sector’s way. But he has also been tough on regulating industries that impact communities and the environment such as mining.


Vice President-elect Leni Robredo: A profile

Becoming Leni Robredo

The Philippines' newly elected vice president is more than the story she loves to tell on the campaign trail.

Read more


As the next Philippine president, Duterte has his work cut out for him.

The complicated bureaucracy that comes with national government will pose a challenge to his quick-fix attitude, although he is already finding ways to circumvent this with requests for “emergency powers” over transportation, for example.

In Davao City, he could count on his loyal councilors to pass ordinances he needed. Lawmakers in the Senate and House of Representatives may not be as obliging. 

Then there is the sheer complexity of running a country of over 100 million people distributed over more than 7,000 islands facing a panoply of problems from poverty to climate change.

There is the added burden of being a head of state or the country’s representative on the global stage, a position he has had little practice for.

He has already gotten his fingers singed with his bad experience with the media whom he has criticized for “slanting” his statements. (READ: Duterte's 'enemy': Jun Pala)

But this is just part of the challenge that comes with running a much bigger and less yielding democracy than Davao City.

In the next 6 years, who will Duterte prove right? His critics or his supporters? Perhaps he’ll do what he does best and take everyone by surprise. – Rappler.com

{source}
<wide-image>
<bg-image style="background: url('http://assets.rappler.com/2DFC054E0A454D75B015064305738BBE/img/2E4233BB86DF48FCA6673F2AEC3C499B/duterte-miting-de-avance-20160507.jpg');">
</bg-image>

</wide-image>
{/source}

In this file photo, Davao City Mayor Rodrigo Duterte (C) speaks to supporters during the 'miting de avance' in Manila, Philippines, May 7, 2016. Jhay Chavez/EPA


Top photo: Davao City Mayor Rodrigo Duterte speaking to supporters during a rally in Manila, Philippines, May 7, 2016. Ritchie B. Tongo/EPA 


Pia Ranada, reporter | Charles Salazar, Jeff Digma, production specialistsChay F. Hofileña, editor | KD Suarez, Dominic Tuazon, design | Alecs Ongcal, European Pressphoto Agency, Duterte-Cayetano Media Team, Davao City Government, photos

 

{source}

<style>

@media screen and (min-width: 1200px) {

top-img > .special-execution-wrapper {
margin-left: 200px;
margin-right: 200px;
margin-top: -20%;
}

}

@media screen and (min-width: 768px) {

wide-image bg-image {
background-attachment: initial !important;
}

}

</style>

{/source}

FAST FACTS: The Bible in PH presidential inaugurations

$
0
0

2010. Benigno Aquino III takes his oath of office before Associate Justice Conchita Carpio-Morales. File photo courtesy of Malacañang

MANILA, Philippines – The Bible has always played a low-key role in presidential inaugurations. The Philippine Constitution does not require the Bible for the swearing-in ceremony, but in a country populated mostly by Catholics, presidents still choose a Bible that holds a personal or historical significance, as part of the long-standing tradition.

During the ceremony, the president traditionally lays his hand on the Bible as he takes his oath of office as the country’s newest chief executive. As he places his left hand on a closed Bible, he states this oath:

“I do solemnly swear [or affirm] that I will faithfully and conscientiously fulfill my duties as President [or Vice-President or Acting President] of the Philippines, preserve and defend its Constitution, execute its laws, do justice to every man, and consecrate myself to the service of the Nation. So help me God."

In case of affirmation, the last sentence will be omitted. The affirmation proviso is in line with the principle of the separation of Church and State, as well as the "non-establishment of religion" clause which says "no religious test shall be required for the exercise of civil and political rights.”

1953. Ramon Magsaysay is the first to use a bible in a presidential inauguration in the country. Photo from Malacañang

Oath taking with the Bible only started under Magsaysay’s term.

From Emilio Aquinaldo to Elpidio Quirino, presidents did not swear on the Bible, as legacy of the Revolution of 1896 which directly engaged the Philippine state at large.

Ramon Magsaysay was the first president to swear on a Bible during his inauguration at the Independence Grandstand (now Quirino Grandstand) in Manila on December 30, 1953.

During this year, the Catholic Welfare Organization (CWO) under the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines (CBCP) decreed legislations and mobilized public opinion that would support the Catholic faith despite the onslaughts against it by the Masons and other anti-Catholics.

This was also the period when the Catholic Church urged the disadvantaged to prevent communist success and coalesced in supporting Magsaysay for president.

President-elects have the option to use two Bibles.

Due to personal preferences, some presidents used two Bibles which were either handed down or personally given by their loved ones.

During his inauguration, Magsaysay used two Bibles – one coming from his father and one from his mother. These were then placed on a lectern as his oath was administered.

Ferdinand Marcos also took his oath on two Bibles on December 30, 1965. One Bible came from his father, Mariano Marcos, while the other one was given by his wife Imelda.

1961. The Bible used in the inauguration of Diosdado Macapagal is the same used in the inauguration of his daughter. Photo from Malacañang

Some inaugural Bibles have been passed down.

Some presidents were also lucky enough to use the same Bible that their parents – their presidential forerunners – once took their oath on.

On June 30, 2004, Gloria Macapagal Arroyo took her oath of office before then Supreme Court Chief Justice Hilario Davide using the same Bible her father, Diosdado Macapagal, used when he was sworn in as president in 1961.

Also, during his inauguration as the 15th president of the Philippines on June 30, 2010, now-outgoing President Benigno Aquino III also used the same Bible that his late mother, Corazon Aquino, swore on to serve the country.

Presidential spouses are usually the bible holders.

Fidel V. Ramos, the first non-Catholic president of the Philippines, still took his oath on a Bible on June 30, 1992 with First Lady Amelita Ramos beside him.

Former Senator Loi Ejercito-Estrada also held the Bible for husband Joseph “Erap” Ejercito Estrada on June 30, 1998.

When Arroyo took oath in Cebu City in 2004, her husband Mike Arroyo was holding the Bible for her.

But other personalities may also hold the bible for presidents.

On December 30, 1957, Bohol Governor Juan Pajo held the Bible as Carlos Garcia – also a Boholano – took his oath.

Corazon Aquino recited the presidential oath as her hands rested on a bible held by her slain husband’s mother, Dona Aurora Aquino, on February 25, 1986 at Club Filipino.

1986. Corazon Aquino takes her oath of office before Supreme Court Chief Justice Claudio Teehankee Sr. Photo from Malacañang

The younger Aquino also broke tradition when he chose Eugenio Lopez, a barangay captain from his hometown to swear him into office. However, on inauguration day, it was Fr Catalino Arevalo, a Jesuit theologian, who held the Bible for him.

The Bible used by Aquino from his inauguration is still in Malacañang.

On June 30, President-elect Rodrigo Duterte will have his youngest child, Kitty, hold the Bible of his mother Soledad as he takes his oath as the 16th president of the Philippines. – Rappler.com

Sources: malacanang.gov.ph, pcdspo.gov.ph

Mary Gleefer Jalea is a Rappler intern.

FAST FACTS: Presidential inauguration traditions and rituals

$
0
0

1957. Carlos P. Garcia takes his oath of office at the Independence Grandstand (named after former president Elpidio Quirino). Photo from Malacañang

MANILA, Philippines – Simple with the least cost. This was the direct order President-elect Rodrigo Duterte gave for his inaugural ceremony on Thursday, June 30.

With preparations almost finalized, this meant rejecting the usual inauguration venue, changing the day’s menu, and even limiting the use of cars to foreign dignitaries only.

Given his request for a humble celebration of his assumption into office, Duterte will be breaking a long line of tradition his predecessors had adhered to.

Inauguration venue

The Quirino Grandstand has seen the most number of presidential inaugurations. Formerly called the Independence Grandstand, the venue takes its name from late president Elpidio Quirino, the second to take his oath of office there. Former president Manuel Roxas started this tradition when he retook his oath in July 4, 1946 as part of the Independence Day celebration. Seven presidents followed in his footsteps.

Emilio Aguinaldo’s official inauguration was held in Barasoain Church in Malolos, Bulacan, where Joseph Estrada was also sworn into office in 1998.

In the American and Japanese colonial periods, some presidents took their oaths in the then-Legislative Building in Manila. The building now houses the National Art Gallery of the National Museum.

Special circumstances caused other presidents to deviate from the traditional route. Manuel L. Quezon and Sergio Osmeña are the only two presidents who were inaugurated abroad, specifically in Washington, DC when the Philippines was transitioning to an independent rule from the Americans.

Corazon Aquino had her inauguration at Club Filipino, Greenhills in San Juan at the height of the people power revolution against Ferdinand Marcos. Former president Gloria Arroyo’s first inauguration was at the EDSA Shrine, Quezon City, after Estrada was forced out of office in 2001.

Duterte will be taking his oath in Rizal Hall, Malacañang. He chose the venue to avoid the inevitable traffic that an inaugural ceremony at the Quirino Grandstand would surely cause. With this choice, his visitors will be limited to only 627.

Salubong

The transfer of power is symbolically demonstrated with the meet-up of the incumbent president and the president-elect. Roxas started this tradition as well, when he fetched Osmeña from Malacañang Palace. The incumbent president lets his successor sign the Palace guestbook as the last guest. He also gets to keep the guestbook.

In 1946, Roxas and Osmeña descended the Grand Staircase of Malacañang together to signal the end of Osmeña’s term as president. Both then headed to Roxas’ inauguration, where they were greeted by a 21 gun salute, assisted by the honor guard presenting arms, 4 ruffles or drum rolls and flourishes, or trumpet blasts. The playing of the National Anthem followed.

The Armed Forces of the Philippines will have a final salute with their chief executive, who in turn bids farewell to the major service commanders.

During former president Ramon Magsaysay’s inauguration in 1953, Quirino immediately left the venue to represent the closing of his term and the beginning of a new one. This tradition still holds today. By the time the elected president takes his oath, the old one must already be in his residence and return to being an ordinary citizen.

The incoming president is supposed to ascend the Grand Staircase later in the day, this time as the president of the republic. In Duterte’s case, he will climb up the stairs upon Aquino’s departure and before he is sworn into office, since the inauguration will be held inside Malacañang.

1953. Ramon Magsaysay takes his oath of office. Photo from Malacañang

Oath-taking

The president of the republic is supposed to take his oath at noon of June 30. The vice president is sworn into office a few minutes before the president, since protocol dictates that no one should follow the president. This also ensures the availability of a constitutionally authorized successor even before the presidential seat is officially filled.

  • The oath

Article 7, Section 5 of the Philippine Constitution dictates the words that would swear the president into office:

I do solemnly swear [or affirm] that I will faithfully and conscientiously fulfill my duties as President [or Vice President or Acting President] of the Philippines, preserve and defend its Constitution, execute its laws, do justice to every man, and consecrate myself to the service of the Nation. So help me God.

The last sentence may be omitted in cases when the president is a non-believer. The president may also choose to use the Filipino version of this oath, as was the case with Laurel, Marcos, Ramos, Estrada, and Benigno Aquino III. Aguinaldo was the only president to use Spanish in his oath.

  • The use of the Bible

Up until Quirino’s inauguration, presidents refrained from swearing on the Bible to preserve the separation of Church and State. Magsaysay broke this tradition, and used two Bibles, one each from his mother and father’s side, when he took his oath. Succeeding presidents followed suit. In 2010, Aquino used the same bible that his mother used when she took her oath in 1986.

For Duterte’s oath-taking, his daughter Veronica, whom they endearingly call “Kitty” will hold the Bible as her father recites the president's pledge.

  • Who administers the oath

While the Constitution does not specify that the Chief Justice should administer the presidential oath, it has been a custom in the Philippines. The Aquino mother and son pair are, so far, the only two presidents who took their oath under associate justices. Duterte will be the third, since he plans to take his oath under former classmate and Associate Justice Bienvenido Reyes.

  • After the oath

Just as a 21-gun salute heralded the arrival of the incumbent president and president-elect at the start of the ceremonies, another 21-gun salute will commence immediately after the oath, along with 4 ruffles and flourishes. The presidential anthem entitled Mabuhay is played, a tradition that dates back to Quezon’s inauguration.

1946. Manuel Roxas delivers his inaugural speech. Photo from Malacañang

Inaugural address

The newly sworn-in president will then give his inaugural address. Here he is given the chance to present his vision for the country during his term, as well as to encourage the people to work hand in hand in ensuring progress in the years to come.

Thus far, Roxas holds the record for the longest inaugural speech, consisting of 4,385 words. Aquino’s inaugural speech in 2010 lasted for around 22 minutes, which consisted of 2,049 words.

As answer to Aquino’s address in 2010, the public rose to recite Panata sa Pagbabago, a pledge that each citizen will help government in effecting change. This was the first time for the public to also pledge their allegiance during the inaugural ceremonies.

First walk up the Grand Staircase as president

After the address, the AFP and the Philippine National Police will salute the president, as recognition of their new commander-in-chief.

Upon his arrival in Malacañang, the president will walk up the Grand Staircase for the first time as the country’s chief executive. Quezon was the first president to practice this tradition, inspired by the story of how Jose Rizal’s mother climbed the stairs on bended knees to pray for her son’s life.

1969. The family of Ferdinand Marcos ascends the main Palace staircase for his second term in office. Photo from Malacañang

The Vin d’honneur and the Rigodon de Honor

Local guests and foreign dignitaries are then treated to a simple reception after the ceremony. The Vin d’honneur, where visitors are treated to wine, as well as the Rigodon de Honor, a dance performed during the inaugural ball, were both conducted until Marcos’ inauguration in 1981. The Palace chose to do away with the grand celebrations and opted for simpler ones after Marcos’ rule.

Duterte’s administration will take the simplicity of the celebrations a notch higher, as he has promised that only maruya and durian candy would be served during his inauguration. Later additions were made by caterer Via Mare – monggo soup, smoked fish with alugbati, pandesal with kesong puti and Vigan longganisa, lumpia ubod, durian tartlet, and fried saba. Instead of wine, guests will be treated to buko juice and pine-mango cooler. – Rappler.com

Source: Gov.ph

Arra Francia is a Rappler intern.

Quotable quotes from inaugural speeches of PH presidents

$
0
0

MANILA, Philippines – In the Philippines, the oath taken by the President has remained unchanged for over a century. What changed were the promises made during the inaugural addresses of the country's 15 presidents.

From Emilio Aguinaldo, the first president of the republic, all the way to Benigno Aquino III, the country's 15th president, inaugural speeches sought to inspire the nation and paint a vision for the future.

Rappler recounts some memorable quotes from the inauguration addresses of the country's presidents.

Emilio Aguinaldo

"We are no longer insurgents; we are no longer revolutionists; that is to say, armed men desirous of destroying and annihilating the enemy. We are from now on Republicans; that is to say, men of law, able to fraternize with all other nations, with mutual respect and affection. There is nothing lacking, therefore, in order for us to be recognized and admitted as a free and independent nation."
– Aguinaldo, in his inaugural speech at Barasoain Church, Malolos, Bulacan, January 23, 1899

Manuel L. Quezon

"We shall build a government that will be just, honest, efficient, and strong so that the foundations of the coming Republic may be firm and enduring – a government, indeed, that must satisfy not only the passing needs of the hour but also the exacting demands of the future."
– Quezon, in his inaugural speech at the Legislative Building, Manila, November 15, 1935

Quezon delivered two more inaugural speeches: after his reelection in 1941 and when the Commonwealth Government was in exile in the United States in 1943.

Jose P. Laurel

"There shall be no tarrying on the way, no desertion from the ranks, no stragglers left behind. Together we shall work, work hard, work still harder, work with all our might, and work as we have never worked before."
– Laurel, in his inaugural speech at the Legislative Building, Manila, October 14, 1943

Sergio Osmeña

"We shall, as a free and self-respecting nation, fulfill our duties not only to ourselves but also to the entire freedom-loving world by participating in the establishment and preservation of a just peace for the benefit of mankind."
– Osmeña at Washington D.C., August 10, 1944, in his inaugural address, following the death of President Quezon

Osmeña's inaugural speech was the 2nd and last one delivered on foreign soil. His address took place at the Office of the Resident Commissioner in Washington DC.

Manuel A. Roxas

"Charity and understanding must replace bitterness and anger. We cannot afford to cherish old feuds or old divisions. For the many tasks of national reconstruction, we need the thousand talents of all our people – men and women alike."
– Roxas, in his inaugural speech at the Legislative Building, Manila, May 28, 1946

Elpidio Quirino

"We cannot leave this job alone to the President and the administration. We cannot leave this job to a few individuals, to special interests and privileged classes. Least of all can we leave this to God alone. We must, one and all, as individuals and as groups, take it upon ourselves to do our part."
– Quirino, in his second inaugural speech at the Independence Grandstand, December 30, 1949

Quirino's first inaugural speech took place in April 1948, when the then-vice president assumed office after the death of then president Manuel Roxas.

His second inaugural address in 1949 was held at the Independence Grandstand in Manila. Now named after him, the Quirino Grandstand played host to a total of 11 inaugural speeches.

Ramon Magsaysay

"We have a glorious past. Now we must build a future worthy of that past."
– Magsaysay, in his inaugural speech at the Independence Grandstand, December 30, 1953

Carlos P. Garcia

"Together we will meet our common problems and difficulties. With the singleness of purpose together we will overcome them."
– Garcia, in his second inaugural speech at the Independence Grandstand, December 30, 1957

Garcia also had two inaugural addresses: when he assumed office in the wake of President Magsaysay's death in a plane crash in March 1957, and his election to the presidency in December 1957.

Diosdado Macapagal

"We must help bridge the wide gap between the poor man and the man of wealth, not by pulling down the rich to his level as communism desires, but by raising the poor up towards the more abundant life. This is democracy’s supreme endeavor."
– Macapagal, in his inaugural speech at the Independence Grandstand, December 30, 1961

Ferdinand Marcos

"This nation can be great again. This I have said over and over. It is my article of faith, and Divine Providence has willed that you and I can now translate this faith into deeds.

I have repeatedly told you: each generation writes its own history. Our forbears have written theirs. With fortitude and excellence we must write ours."

– Marcos, in his inaugural speech at the Independence Grandstand, December 30, 1965

Marcos had a record 4 inaugural speeches: when he was elected in 1965, after his reelection in 1969 and in 1981, and after the contested February 1986 snap elections.

Corazon Aquino

"We became exiles, we Filipinos who are at home only in freedom, when Marcos destroyed the Republic fourteen years ago. Now, by God’s grace and the power of the people, we are free again."
– Aquino, in her inaugural speech at Club Filipino, San Juan, February 25, 1986

February 25, 1986, is the only day in Philippine history with two presidential inaugurations. Both Marcos and Corazon Aquino laid claim to the presidency following that year's snap polls. Aquino's speech was delivered in Club Filipino in San Juan, while Marcos' address was at Malacañang Palace.

Fidel V. Ramos

"I have asked Mang Pandoy and his family to be my guests in this inaugural ceremony as proof of my resolve to obtain for families like theirs all over the country the humanities of life. Poverty we must learn to regard as another form of tyranny, and we must wage against it the moral equivalent of war."
– Ramos, in his inaugural speech at Quirino Grandstand, Manila, June 30, 1992

Felipe Natanio or Mang Pandoy was a street vendor who became the "face of the poor" during the Ramos administration. Unable to rise out of poverty, he passed away in 2008 due to tuberculosis.

Meanwhile, Ramos mentioned Jose Rizal a total of 7 times in his inaugural address. A total of 9 presidents mentioned the national hero's name in their speeches.

Joseph Estrada

"Ngayon pa lamang, ang mga kamag-anak ko ay nilalapitan na ng kung sinu-sino. Kung anu-anong deal at kickback ang ipinapangako.

Binabalaan ko sila. Walang kaibigan, walang kumpare, walang kamag-anak o anak na maaaring magsamantala sa ngayon. At ngayon pa lamang sinasabi ko sa inyo, nag-aaksaya lamang kayo ng panahon. Huwag ninyo akong subukan."

(This early, members of my family are approached by all sorts of people, promising all kinds of deals and kickbacks.

I am warning them. There will be no friend, no compadre, no relative or offspring who can take advantage right now. This early, I'm telling you: you are just wasting your time. Don't you dare test me.)

– Estrada, in his inaugural speech at Quirino Grandstand, Manila, June 30, 1998

Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo

"I shall make good and I shall do good for the good of all and not just for the cameras. The canvassing for public attention is over. I expect you to get up every day to hold me accountable, in the full glare of transparent leadership. I shall wield the power of the Presidency to uphold truth and justice.

I devote my life and treasure to serving your mandate. Do your responsibility and I shall do mine. United, how can we lose? Together, we will prevail!"

– Arroyo, in her second inaugural address at Quirino Grandstand, Manila, June 30, 2004

Arroyo's first inaugural speech took place on January 20, 2001, at the Our Lady of EDSA Shrine in Mandaluyong City, shortly after the ouster of President Estrada through another revolution dubbed EDSA 2.

Her second inauguration happened after securing a 6-year mandate in the 2004 polls.

Benigno Aquino III

"Walang lamangan, walang padrino, at walang pagnanakaw. Walang wang-wang, walang counterflow, walang tong. Panahon na upang tayo ay muling magkawang-gawa. Nandito tayo ngayon dahil sama-sama tayong nanindigan at nagtiwala na may pag-asa."

(No more taking advantage, no more patronage politics, no more stealing. No sirens, no counterflow, no bribes. It is time for us to do charity again. We are here today because together we took a stand and trusted there is hope.)

– Aquino, in his inaugural speech at Quirino Grandstand, Manila, June 30, 2010

How long?

The shortest inaugural address ever given was by Elpidio Quirino. With only 47 words, his remarks were delivered two days after the unforeseen death of then president Manuel A. Roxas in April 1948.

Ranking second was the speech given by former president Corazon Aquino, with 210 words, delivered at the conclusion of the People Power Revolution in 1986.

On the other hand, with 4,385 words, the longest inauguration speech was delivered by Roxas in 1946. A close second is Jose P. Laurel’s 1943 address, given during the Japanese occupation. His inaugural speech was 4,104 words long.  with research by Jodesz Gavilan and Michael Bueza/Rappler.com

Sources: gov.ph, malacanang.gov.ph, various news reports

Rambo Talabong is a Rappler intern.

Viewing all 8614 articles
Browse latest View live